Ashok Kumar Yadav v. State Of Haryana And Others

215.1 ASHOK

IN THE HIGH COURT OF

AT CHA F PUNJAB AND HARYANA ANDIGARH CWP-217 Date of D 760-2022 (O&M) Decision : 27.05.2026 KUMAR YADAV ........Petitioner US VERSU OF HARYANA AND OTHERS STATE O

CORAM

Present:

HARSIM 1.

S ........Respondents M: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI DEEPAK MANCHANDA I HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D Mr. Prithvi Raj Yadav, Advo Ms. Kanchan, Advocate for t ocate with the petitioner.

Mr. Aman Mittal, DAG Hary yana.

Mr. Pradip Bhandari, Advoca ate for respondent No.3.

MRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral l) In the present petition, chall enge is to the Ordinance publish hed on 02.09.

2022 in the Haryana Governme ent Gazette (Extra), and a period d of 04 years h has expired. Hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed d of as not pre essed any further, with liberty to o the petitioner that, in case the s said Ordinance e has been converted into law w by an appropriate Notificati ion, liberty be granted to challenge the same b y filing an appropriate remedy.

2.

Ordered accordingly.

(HA ARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 27-05-202 Sapna Goyal (D DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE easoned: YES NO OTE:

Whether speaking/ re Whether reportable:

NO SAPNA GOYAL 2026.05.29 11:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document