Central Public Information Officer v. Harinder Dhingra And ANR.

 
    
 

 !" #$%$!&'()* +  ,
&- )(.)$# &"!-/ $!&""$# - 00 $$!& - 1 -%(%  -$&2 -3$&4- &2 &!3 - 00 %5!&2 &%
6'

 78609
9 6 9

9

 

     

       



   

9 6 9

9 0 8



            



  







 !

!  

# $

 



%

 .

 $!

.!! %

 

!

 %

!
 

  

% 

%  

!

 & /   



%

 !

%
+,- 

 

% % 

   

   !

  0% $!

 #''1

 !





! %

!

%  !!

     

   



 

  

$

  



% %



   %  !  '

'1 #'

( !

%  

 '

'1 #'



!

 

 , 



  56  ! . $

 

   
        

  !    "

#  $% &

%'"  



 %  



 %

 7%!

 "14) In our considered opinion, the aforementioned principle of law applies to the facts of this case on all force. It is for the reasons that, firstly, the information sought by respondent No.1 of individual employees working in the Bank was personal in nature; secondly, it was exempted from being disclosed under Section 8(j) of the Act and lastly, neither respondent No.1 disclosed any public interest much less larger public interest involved in seeking such information of the individual employee and nor any finding was recorded by the Central Information Commission and the High Court as to the involvement of any larger public interest in supplying such information to respondent No.1."

$

 

  $!

.!! 

!

 %

!
 

  

% 

%  !

 %

   ! 

 $!

.!!

   56  ! . $

  !(  #   ) *   !   

% 



 





! ()* +  ,

9 6 9

9

harsha   %9   :