← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/43304/2023allowed

Rajesh Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Another

2024-02-07Ms. Justice Harpreet Kaur Jeewan5 pages

-1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 07.02.2024 RAJESH KUMAR ......PETITIONER Vs.

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER .........RESPONDENTS

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN

Present:

Mr. Kulwinder Singh, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner.

 

  Mr. R.K. Kachara, Advocate, for Mr. Abhishek Chaa, Advocate, for respondent No. 2-complainant.

***** HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN J. (ORAL) CRM-4781-2024 1.

  

 



     

 !





"#$%%"%&

'

( )!

*+!+

,-  

 $ %

     

        

!





"#$%%"%&

'



  

 $!'

 ! .  

 

/ 

  

-2CRM-4783-2024 1.

By this application, the applicant-petitioner seeks preponement of the date of hearing in the main petition from 21.03.2024 to some early date.

2.

Since the matter has been compromised between the parties and a report of the learned trial Court has also been received, pursuant to the order dated 31.08.2023 passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the application is allowed and the date of hearing in the accompanying petition is advanced from 21.03.2024 to today itself. The case is taken up on Board. CRM-M-43304-2023 1.

( 



!

01%

+ (

! +

$#2&3!

*45 6$2

%1"2%"%"!

0#1 0"7&%&

6"7

4(+ 

&0



(   +5 

'

%#"2%"%&8

( %9 .

!

 % +!







*45



 

%   



  

  

      

 

 %#"2%"%& 8

( %9 .

!

'



.



 :



:

    

!

$& 



!

$#66 '



'

( )!

*+!+

,- 

-3-





 '



   

 $

&  !

!' !7""""";

 '

 

%





!! 





 '



  6

!



'

*+!8

 $9 0 <

   !

  !'        

 *45  

   

  

  :

  :  

 

!

 :

  !

  :

 

  

 !

   !





  !

$2&+(+

  

  

           '

 

 

6 <

!

 



%   

! '



!'

 '



*45  

 3!

' +! 7 / &$"1%"%&

  

 '



 +!;43        

   

  

  

 2 (!! 

  

   

= : 

 

"#$"%"%& 

' :   







%  

 5  

:

 

 >

 The compromise is willful and without any pressure or misrepresentation.

-4-  Identity of the parties was ascertained by their respective Advocates.

 The challan was presented only against the present petitioner.

 The petitioner has never been declared Proclaimed Offender in the present FIR.

 As per record given by the investigating officer no other case is pending against the petitioner.

 The complainant Khushboo (respondent No. 2) was only the aggrieved person in this case.

1

 ?' *!

+! 



    

        

  

!" 

  

 



3! 

 



'

:!@  .



 !

01% 

+ (

! +



:



 



  ! 

,

   

   '



  A :

'!



  +!BA !

 ! B,

:  %6

%1 !

>

      

!"      # $  %

!!!& ! '%    !"

!! ! #% ( !!    )    !  !! !     

!" !! !    !

-5- %!  ."

#



: 

 '



%



 :!



!

 '!

 ! 

  !



    

    !  !  

    *45  

  3!

 

 3!

' 





      !      

!



 

*45   

 !

  

:

'

3!

$" + 3!







*45 6$2

%1"2%"%"!

0#1 0"7&%&

6"7

4(+

 &0



(   +5 

  

 !' 3!

  

   

    

   '

3!

3!

 11.

Pending miscellaneous application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

February 07, 2024 (HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN) nitin JUDGE Whether Speaking Yes Whether reportable No