Raj Kumar v. Chadigarh Administration & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP-8896-2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.05.2017 Raj Kumar ..... Petitioner

Versus

Chandigarh Administration and others ..... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Rakesh Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia seeking quashing of impugned order dated 27.03.2017 (Annexure P-4) whereby the property/premises in question i.e. plot No. 12, Tansport Nagar, Sector-26, Chandigarh, was sealed by respondent No. 3.

2.

After arguing for sometime, it was prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition. However, liberty be granted to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to him, in accordance with law. 3.

Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedy, if any, as may be available to him, in accordance with law.

4.

A copy of this order be forwarded to the respondents to avoid multiplicity of litigation.

( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE May 02, 2017 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Rishu Kataria 2017.05.05 12:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Whether Reportable Yes/No