Vijay Kumar Dhanuka v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-39082-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-39082-2025 Date of Decision: 16.01.2026 Vijay Kumar Dhanuka

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Jasdev Singh Mehndiratta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shivendra Dwivedi, Advocate Mr. Rishab Raj Jain, Advocate Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate Mr. Kanwarnoor Singh Sethi, Advocate and Ms. Tanveen Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Shiva Khurmi, D.A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Vinod Ghai, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Rahul Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Suhaan Mukerji, Advocate Mr. Arnav Ghai, Advocate Mr. Adarsh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Tanmay Sinha, Advocate Mr. R.S. Bagga, Advocate and Mr. Aditya Narayan Arya Garg, Advocate for the complainant.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 25.03.2023 DLF, Sector 29, Gurugram 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 201 IPC 1.

The petitioner, incarcerated in the FIR captioned above, had come up before this Court under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking regular bail.

2.

Vide order dated 17.09.2025, this Court had granted interim regular bail to the petitioner subject to his joining investigation as and when called upon to do so by the Investigator and concerned Superintendent of Police was directed to conduct further investigation in the FIR captioned above for recovery of proceeds of crime. 3.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has complied with the condition as envisaged by this Court and has cooperated with the Investigating Agency. JYOTI SHARMA 2026.01.27 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

CRM-M-39082-2025 4.

Counsel for the complainant as well as State does not dispute the aforesaid fact and counsel for the complainant submits that he has no objection if the interim bail granted to the petitioner is made absolute.

5.

Given above, the present petition is allowed. Interim order dated 17.09.2025 is made absolute. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 16.01.2026 Jyoti Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No.

JYOTI SHARMA 2026.01.27 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh