Paramjit Kaur And Others v. Raju And Others
!"
# $% & '(( )
!"
$!*!+*, - *&( ( .
/0!
1 1 !*& 2 ( ( .
Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? No Whether full judgment is pronounced?
Yes & 34
5( 5 5
5
!
""""
5
5
(
# $ % & '
()(*+(#) %, !$%
$ $
#--
#.//0
1$%
23
&
#(#+4((5
&' 6-7
8'
&68
#4(/+(## +
' %, $%
9 %
:
%, 5
4 54 5 * $
%, $%
'
%
$
, % '
% ' )
!
, ' ,&
' %, $%
& $ !
, ;<-*(*+(#): &
$
,
4
'
54 46
5
- =
2% !
Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another 7 '
.
5+/$ - !+$ # # 8
'
'
>30
!"#$
%# !"&$
&' !"($
31)
* (+,
-
$ . /
*
32
(+,
(+,
* * * * * * 42. )
&$ 0
1 $ !2 !(%+ %!
%(
$
3!4 %'#+
3!'#!#(
3!(#'&+
3
!&&!&(
3!#&'(+
3!!(!((
35 (''+
34'!'(
3(''4+
? =
2% !
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. 7
.
5 . 8 '
#--#-*
#-/
#.//
' & 03 @
& A
&
&
0!3 &
%
, & B 0@3
% &
,
A '
0C3 ;
&
&' %B , A , $
&
>52. 6 conventional heads
7/
8*
7 %(+++
7 !+++++
7 !+++++
7/
0 9
:
) 6
;
*
!(+++ 7 &++++ 7 !(+++
<
)
!+,
)
= = = = = 59.3)
(+,
/
.
&+
#+,
&+ (+
*
(+'+
!(, 6
59.4*
$
&+,
&+
6 %(,
&+(+
!+,
(+'+
59.5.
#+#%0> ?
59.6.
0> @ &%/
59.7
59.87
7
!(+++7 &++++ 7 !(+++
!+,
A
/ =
2% !
9-
* $
*#+$ *, !-/ *:
4;-; 1 <#(
*+ -
0;
# =+=$+ - = $# 7
5 2 8
& 5 $0
< $- #+/$
$ * :
5 =;
5+/$
'& &
B216 <
C 0 8
;
*
D D
D D D
D D D
)
%!! Spousal consortium
D
/ D %!% Parental consortium
D
D %!# Filial consortium
6
22
3 /
E
3 /
23 3>
6
*
C
6 6
'
24
D
D C 0 8*
7 &++++
.
& '
&
&9 % &
'
$%
, &
#4
#-;
$%
&
A
$
' 9
&
!
45
#(
'
'
'
%,=
2% !
%
& ' $'
()(*+(#)
&, $
Sr.
No.
Heads Compensation Awarded #
, ?4((5 + ;
6)(7 *(((50)(7
?4((3 * @
'
A
#5) +-+450#(4((D#5)3 ) $ ?/?450#(4((+-+43 ) #-
@
, #4#+(((50?/?4D#+D#-3 -
C #4(((5 ?
;
CA #4(((5
/
!
+(((((5 )((((5A# ;)((((5A# )((((5A* !
!-/ *# ;!* #(> > ? 1+,;!*
' %,$%
#( >>) ? *= *, 1
-!+* #(>'>) ? )
##
%,=
2% !
Dara Singh @ Dhara Banjara Vs. Shyam Singh Varma ' 2.
R.Valli and Others VS. Tamil Nandu State Transport Corporation
) 5+/$ - !+$ # # > & 6.7
&
F
#+
!
,
&' '$%
'
'
,
& $$%
%
&'
5 '
()(*+(#) $ 5
% :
$%
#*
&
,
5
5
( ( .
G: &5
: & H5I G % H