Neena Roy v. Rahul Sharma

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.108 TA-981-2024 Date of Decision:10.09.2024 NEENA ROY ....Applicant

Versus

RAHUL SHARMA .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Arjun Veer Sharma, Advocate for the applicant.

***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to pursue with the instant transfer application, which may be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars. Ordered accordingly.

(ARCHANA PURI) 10.09.2024 JUDGE
 Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Anu 2024.09.11 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document