← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/36706/2025disposed of

Ajay Kumar Alias Aji v. State Of Punjab

2026-02-24Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth2 pages

CRM-M-36706-2025 - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36706-2025 Decided on : 24.02.2026 Ajay Kumar alias Aji . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Punjab . . . Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Manoj R. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Neeraj Madaan, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

**** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) 1.

Instant petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (corresponding Section 439 of Cr.P.C.) for grant of regular bail to the petitioner - Ajay Kumar @ Aji, in case FIR No. 77, dated 13.05.2025, under Sections 22, 21-61-85 of NDPS Act, registered at Police Station Division No.2, Pathankot, Distt. Pathankot.

2.

In the present case, on 08.10.2025, following order was passed by this Court:- "1.

Learned State counsel submits that petitioner is involved in five other cases, the details of which are as under:- (i) FIR No. 48, dated 20.11.2019, u/s 21, 29-61-85 of NDPS Act, PS Nangal Bhoor.

(ii) FIR No. 26, dated 06.03.2021, u/s 21-61-85 of NDPS Act, PS Sadar Pathankot.

(iii) FIR No. 38, daed 13.05.2021, u/s 21B, 29-61-85 of NDPS Act, PS Behrampur, District Gurdaspur.

(iv) FIR No. 109, dated 17.06.2021, u/s 21B-61-85 of NDPS Act, PS Dinanagar, District Gurdaspur and (iv) FIR No. 93, dated 24.09.2022, u/s 21, 29-61-85 of NDPS Act, PS Sadar Pathankot.

2.

Let a comprehensive status report be filed, detailing the role of the petitioner in the present case, evidence collected by the prosecution JAWALA RAM 2026.02.26 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-36706-2025 - 2 - during the investigation, and the antecedents of the petitioner. The status report shall also include details of the evidence against the petitioner, as well as the current status of the five cases mentioned above. 3.

List again on 17.12.2025."

3.

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous, as the petitioner has already been released on default bail.

4.

In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.

Pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE February 24, 2026 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2026.02.26 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document