← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/22233/2024disposed of

Ikbal Singh v. State Of Haryana And Others

2024-09-05Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

Sr. No.: 120 Civil Writ Petition No.22233 of 2024 Date of Decision: September 05, 2024 Ikbal Singh ..... PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

State of Haryana & others ..... RESPONDENT(S)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA PRESENT: - Mr. Parth Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Tribhuvan Dahiya, J (Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned objection letters, dated 10.02.2022, Annexure P-5 and 18.08.2022, Annexure P-6, issued by the respondents, whereby objections have been raised regarding the petitioner's claim for grant of benefit of second Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACP) on the ground that he is ineligible for promotion to the post of Elementary School Head Master (ESHM).

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the second respondent. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case the second respondent is directed to decide his pending legal notice, dated 10.06.2024, Annexure P-21, in a specified period.

3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana., accepts notice and submits that the pending legal notice, dated 10.06.2024, will be decided by the second respondent expeditiously. AVIN KUMAR 2024.09.06 08:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.

CWPNo.22233 of 2024 [2] 5.

In view thereof, without going into the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent-Director, Elementary Education, to consider and decide the legal notice, dated 10.06.2024, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from receiving a certified copy of this order. 6.

In case the petitioner is found entitled to the claimed benefit, the same shall be released within two weeks thereafter. 7.

In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ` 25,000 to the petitioner. (Tribhuvan Dahiya) Judge September 05, 2024 avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned:

Yes/ No Whether Reportable:

Yes/ No AVIN KUMAR 2024.09.06 08:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.