Union Of India Through Its Secretary To Government Of India And Others v. No 4476098y Ex Sep Jaswant Singh And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-24044-2024 (O&M) Decided on :08.04.2026 UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND OTHERS

...Petitioners

Versus

NO 4476098Y EX SEP JASWANT SINGH AND ANOTHER . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA PRESENT: Mr. S. K. Sharma, Senior Panel Counsel for the petitioners.

Mr. Arshit Goel, Advocate for respondent No. 1. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral) 1.

In the present petition, challenge is to the impugned order dated 31.01.2019 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.2-Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench Chandigarh (in short, 'the Tribunal') by which, respondent No.1 has been allowed the benefit of disability pension alognwith the benefit of rounding off of the disability element @ 50% as against 40% for life, even though he was discharged from service being an undesirable soldier.

2.

Learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 submits that the issue raised in the present petition has already been considered and rejected by this Court while passing the order in CWP-29083-2025- 'Union of India and others versus Ex. Sep. Bias Dev Singh and another, decided on 26.09.2025' and the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners have already been negativated . Hence, the present petition may also be dismissed in the same terms and conditions. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has not been able to rebut the aforesaid facts.

RIYA 2026.04.10 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-24044-2024 (O&M) 4.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the case file with their able assistance. 5.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case wherein the question of law raised has already been answered by this Court while passing the order in CWP-29083-2025- 'Union of India and others versus Ex. Sep. Bias Dev Singh and another, decided on 26.09.2025' hence, the present writ petition is also dismissed in the same terms and conditions.

6.

Pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE ( DEEPAK MANCHANDA ) JUDGE 08.04.2026 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No RIYA 2026.04.10 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document