Santosh Kumari & ANR v. Urmila Kumari & ORS
!
"
#$% &' (%)*+*&,- ."" / ""00%11#,$+ 2%3+4+ 5 / ""%+0&,(%,$+ "
/ ""00%11#,$+ 2%3+4+
""%+0&,(%,$+ - 6 5 "
5 / 5
!
" #$%&$%'!'
( $)*+,$%'!!-
.
% " $)*+,$%'!!-
/
1
1
!
, ( !% 1
!) !3 " #$%&$%'!'- 2
5 / 57
3#1 "
3*%' #)$+ &' $8% )#+%- ! !
5
#$%&$%'!'
$)*+,$%'!!
11
! %
6
#$%&$%'!'
4
! )
6
8 ! +
&3)
6 1/
1
:
3);
!+
<
6
,;
8
6 1/
1
+)
6
6
! 3
1
%!;
!!
1 68
3+
&
1
1
') '3 !*&, . 1
1
3+
&
%!3
&
1/ 1
1
1 9
8
.
1
= 69
8
1
1
1
1 9
8
: 2 !!& "%- "-
9 > !,,&
1
9 1 '% '+ %'!'
"
*+)4++*&, 9: $8*+ &43$- % !
: 2 % % # %! '% %'%+
$ Heard the learned counsel representing the parties at some length.
Admittedly, the total joint holding of four brothers, namely Hanuman Parshad, Girraj Parshad, Mathura Parshad and Dwarka Parshad along with certain other co-sharers was 753 kanals and 5 marlas. It has been projected before this Court that at the first instance, the land measuring 536 kanals and 14 marlas was partitioned in the year 1973 and an instrument of partition was prepared. Thus, the case of the appellants is that Hanuman Parshad, Girraj Parshad, Mathura Parshad and Dwarka Parshad were allocated the land measuring 58 kanals and 5 marlas, whereas the land measuring 216 kanals and 11 marlas with proportionate share of these four brothers remained.
On the other hand, it is the case of the defendants that in the year 1973, Hanuman Parshad and Girraj Parshad were allocated the land measuring 58 kanals and 5 marlas and therefore, their share in the remaining land will come to 25 kanals and 5 marlas. On the one hand, the respondents are relying upon mutation for final partition in the year 1973, whereas on the other hand, the learned counsel representing the appellants relies upon goshwara.
In this case, the document will be the instrument of partition drawn by the Court of Assistant Collector 1st Grade while partitioning the land measuring 536 kanals and 14 marlas.
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the learned counsel representing the parties as well as the learned State counsel, who is present in the Court, are requested
to produce a copy of the instrument of partition on the next date of hearing.
List on 29.02.2024, in the urgent list.
A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of another connected case. % )
/
1
/
1
?1 1
61
6
8
,;
6 1/
1
+) 9/ % +
8
1
6
%!;
!!
1
+) % 3
6 ,)
/
+) / !*&)
/
1
+'
% ;
61
% &
1
6 6
.
: 2
/
/
1
/
! % , $)*+,$%'!!
6 1
1 9
1
3+
!;
/
/
1 9
6
/
"
%)*+*&,- ) !
4
6
) % :1
/ ) )
8
2
) +
1
/
03*1 .$87
5 / 5
!"#
$! % #&$
$
' % #&$