Jobanjeet Singh And Another v. State Of Punjab And Others
CRWP No.10842 of 2021 ...1...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No.10842 of 2021 Date of Decision: 17th November, 2021.
Jobanjeet Singh & Another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab & Others
...Respondents
(Heard through Video-Conferencing) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present:
Ms. Rishma Verma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.
(ORAL) By way of the instant petition, both the petitioners seek the indulgence of this Court for the issuance of a direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect their lives and liberty as they apprehend threat to the same at the hands of respondents No.4 to 7 because they (petitioners) have solemnized their marriage against the wishes of these respondents. It has also been mentioned in this petition that a representation (Annexure P-5) has already been moved to respondent No.2 in this regard. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only. Mr. Sukhbeer Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, who has joined the proceedings on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 in this case in pursuance of the copies of the present petition having been sent to the respondent-State in advance, accepts the notice on behalf of these respondents.
Heard.
SEEMA SHARMA 2021.11.17 16:19 I attest to the accuracy of this order
CRWP No.10842 of 2021 ...2...
Learned counsel for the petitioners restricts her prayer to the issuance of a direction to respondent No.2 to look into and take appropriate action on the said representation of the petitioners, i.e. Annexure P-5. Learned State counsel has no objection for the same. Keeping in view the above-discussed limited prayer as made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without commenting or expressing any opinion on the legality and validity of the marriage as stated to have been solemnized between the petitioners, respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Tarn Taran, is hereby directed to look into the said representation (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners and if it is found that the petitioners genuinely deserve any protection, then to take appropriate action in accordance with law.
This petition stands disposed of accordingly. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 17.11.2021.
seema Whether speaking/reasoned?
Yes Whether Reportable?
No SEEMA SHARMA 2021.11.17 16:19 I attest to the accuracy of this order