Akshay Lamba v. State Of Haryana & ORS.
Vinod Kumar 2017.05.06 13:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CWP No.9126 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision:05.05.2017 Akshay Lamba
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present:
Mr. N.R.Dahia, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.R.Mahajan, Advocate General, Haryana, with Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
Mr. Surender Kumar, Advocate, for respondent no.3-University.
Mr. Anil Rana, Advocate, for Mr. Puneet Gupta, Advocate, for respondent no.4-UOI. ***** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral) The only prayer made in this petition is for a direction to the respondents to hold the counselling as early as possible. Learned Advocate General, who is present in the Court, has submitted that there is already a direction by the Supreme Court to complete the counselling on or before 07.05.2017.
In view thereof, the present petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous accordingly.
May 05, 2017 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge Whether speaking / reasoned:
Yes/No Whether Reportable:
Yes/No