Sanjeev Kumar Mittal v. State Of Haryana And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.9148 of 2017 Date of decision:01.05.2017 Sanjeev Kumar Mittal ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana and another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. Rose Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied if direction is issued to respondent No.2 for taking appropriate action on the applications/representations (Annexure P-4) and legal notice dated 04.03.2016 (Annexure P-5) within a stipulated period. Without going into the merits and demerits of the matter, I direct respondent No.2 to consider the applications/representations (Annexure P-4) and legal notice dated 04.03.2016 (Annexure P-5) served upon him by the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereon, in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. He shall also ensure that the applications and representation are not an outcome of personal ego and decide the same in a most objective and pragmatic manner.

The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. May 01, 2017 (AMIT RAWAL) savita JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2017.05.01 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh