Shahina And ANR v. State Of Haryana And Others

ARCHANA ARORA 2022.09.27 15:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No. 9248 of 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA,

CHANDIGARH CRWP No. 9248 of 2022 Date of decision : September 27, 2022 Shahina and another ....... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ........ Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present:- Mr. Jamshed Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioners.

*** Pankaj Jain, J (oral).

By way of present petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioners seek issuance of directions to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to protect their life and liberty at the hands of respondent Nos. 4 to 7.

Notice of motion.

On the asking of the Court Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl.AG, Haryana., who is present in Court accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3. As per petitioners, they have solemnized their Nikah on 11.08.2022 against the wishes of respondents No. 4 to 7, who happen to be the family members/relatives of petitioner No.1 i.e. Shahina. Both the petitioners have claimed themselves to be major relying upon their Aadhar Cards indicating that petitioner No.1-Shahina is 01.01.2000 born and petitioner No.2-Hasheen is 01.01.1996 born. Without commenting on the legality and validity of the marriage, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Nuh to look into the representation dated 18.08.2022 (Annexure P-4) submitted by the petitioners.

ARCHANA ARORA 2022.09.27 15:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No. 9248 of 2022 Keeping in view the fact that both the petitioners claim to have married, I think that if possible, respondent No.2 may call a meeting of the petitioners as well as respondents No. 4 to 7 in his presence, so that the parties get rid off their ill feelings and live amicably. The petition stands disposed off.

(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE September 27, 2022 archana Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No