D. Pavitra Madhusudan v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-9331-2017 (O&M) Decided on :28.11.2023 D. Pavitra Madhusudan . .Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others . . . Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI PRESENT: None for the petitioner.

Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Govind Tanwar, Advocate for HPSC.

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral) 1.

Learned Sate counsel submits that keeping in view the order passed by this Court in CWP No.2510 of 2017 tilted as 'Surender Singh and Others v. State of Haryana and Others', decided on 07.11.2022, the claim raised by the petitioner in the present petition is covered against him. 2.

No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. 3.

On the last date of hearing also, the case was adjourned on the request made on behalf of the petitioner.

4.

It can be safely presumed that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present remedy.

5.

Dismissed for non-prosecution.

(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 28.11.2023 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No RIYA 2023.11.29 16:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document