Vinod Kumar Bansal v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.9352 of 2017 Date of Decision.03.05.2017 Vinod Kumar Bansal ........Petitioner Vs State of Haryana and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. Mohit Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL -.- AMIT RAWAL J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied if a direction is issued to the 2nd respondent-Director, Urban Local Bodies, Haryana Panchkula to take appropriate action on the representation dated 12.04.2017 (Annexure P-5) within a stipulated period. Without going into the merits and demerits of the claim of the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to direct the 2nd respondent-Director, Urban Local Bodies, Haryana Panchkula to take appropriate action on the representation dated 12.04.2017 (Annexure P-5) within a period two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and shall pass a speaking order thereon.

The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE May 03, 2017 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2017.05.04 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document