Subhash Chand Mittal v. Union Of India And ORS

CWP-9383-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.9383 of 2017 Date of Decision: 26.04.2022 SUBHASH CHAND MITTAL ......Petitioner Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH Present:Mr. B.D. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Satya Pal Jain, Addl. Solicitor General of India with Ms. Saigeeta Srivastava, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2.

Mr. Naresh Gopal Sharma, Advocate Mr. Vipan Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Mehardeep Singh, Advocate for respondent No.6.

Ms. Samridhi Sareen, Advocate for respondent No.7.

Ms. Reeta Kohli, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Vandana, Advocate for respondent No.8.

**** RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) At the time of filing of this writ petition, Registry took certain objections in respect of maintainability of this petition. Admittedly, petitioner has pleaded in para no.3 of the petition that this writ petition is being filed in public interest. In view of aforesaid factual position this writ petition is MOHMED ATIK 2022.04.27 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-9383-2017  not maintainable before the Single Bench of this Court. In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to comply with the requirement of Rule 6 of Maintainability of Public Interest Litigation Rules, 2010 framed by the High Court before espousing the cause under the public interest litigation.

(RAJ MOHAN SINGH) April 26, 2022 JUDGE Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHMED ATIK 2022.04.27 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document