Vinod Kumar Khosla v. State Of Punjab And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.9416 of 2017 Date of Decision.03.05.2017 Vinod Kumar Khosla ........Petitioner Vs State of Punjab and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. Rajbir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL -.- AMIT RAWAL J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner had approached this Court for seeking appropriate direction for demarcation of the land and in that context, had also made representation. This Court had disposed of the writ petition with direction to do the needful. Having failed to do so, contempt petition bearing No.22/2017 is stated to be pending. Under the threat of contempt proceedings, respondents have fixed the date of 05.05.2017 for demarcation of the land but the allegation is that the Kanungo, who has been authorized to do the demarcation of the land, has colluded with other side. In my view, the petitioner can always take all the objections at the time of demarcation and in case the demarcation, according to the petitioner, is not according to the factual aspect, his remedy would be to seek possession of the land by filing suit on the basis of preponderance of evidence by leading direct and cogent evidence. With the aforementioned observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE May 03, 2017 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2017.05.04 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document