Gurkirat Singh v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M- 37652 of 2019 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M- 37652 of 2019 (O&M) Date of decision : 29.1.2020 ...

Gurkirat Singh ................Petitioner vs.

State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr.P.S. Jammu, Advocate for the petitioner Rana Harjasdeep Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has since joined the investigation.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Sulakhan Singh, concedes this fact, further contending that the petitioner is not required for custodial interrogation by the local police. In these circumstances, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 6.9.2019 is made absolute, subject to fulfillment of following conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.:- i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation, as and when required, by the police; BANITA CHUGH 2020.01.29 15:41 I am the author of this document

CRM-M- 37652 of 2019 -2ii)that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and iii)that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court and shall surrender his passport, if any.

The petition in that way is allowed.

( H.S. Madaan ) 29.1.2020 Judge chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No BANITA CHUGH 2020.01.29 15:41 I am the author of this document