Sunita @ Meenu v. State Of Haryana And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38203-2019 Date of decision:9.9.2019 SUNITA @ MEENU .....Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....Respondents **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL ****
Present:
Mr. Ankur Lal, Advocate for the petitioner.
**** GURVINDER SINGH GILL , J. (ORAL) 1.
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking issuance of a direction to the respondents for getting the matter pertaining to FIR No.45 dated 21.7.2019 under Sections 376, 376(2)(N), 450, 506, 34, Police Station Women, Hansi investigated fairly and impartially. 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the accused in the present case are threatening the petitioner to compromise the matter and that the police despite the FIR having been lodged in July, 2019 has not taken any effective steps for investigation in the matter. 3.
Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and while refraining from expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of GAURAV SOROT 2019.09.09 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
(2) CRM-M-38203-2019 with a direction to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Hissar to look into the matter pertaining FIR No.45 dated 21.7.2019 under Sections 376, 376(2)(N), 450, 506, 34, Police Station Women, Hansi and to ensure that the same is investigated expeditiously so that a final report be filed at the earliest.
4.
A copy of this order along be sent to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Hissar so as to enable him to do the needful expeditiously. ( GURVINDER SINGH GILL) 9.9.2019 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking?
Yes / No Whether reportable?
Yes / No GAURAV SOROT 2019.09.09 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document