Rohit Masih v. State Of Punjab
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: 13.12.2024 Rohit Masih .... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - Mr. Harjot Singh Mann, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Aakanksha Gupta, A.A.G., Punjab.
*** NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the 1st petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case of his arrest, in case FIR No. 44 dated 23.05.2024 under Sections 363, 366-A, 120-B IPC (offence under Section 376 IPC added subsequently) registered at Police Station Qila Lal Singh, District Gurdaspur (Annexure P-1). On 28.08.2024, when this case was listed for hearing, following order was passed by this Court:- "Prayer in the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 44 dated 23.05.2024 under Sections 363, 366-A, 120-B IPC (offence under Section 376 IPC added subsequently) registered at Police Station Qila Lal Singh, District Gurdaspur.
Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated
-2in the present FIR and the only reason that the petitioner has been embroiled in the present FIR is that he is close friend of the main accused Karan. It is submitted that the petitioner has no role to play in the alleged abduction of the victim on 21.05.2024. Furthermore, the FIR has been registered after a delay of 2 days i.e. on 23.05.2024 on the statement made by the father of the victim. It is further pointed out that the co-accused of the petitioner, who is sisterin-law/bhabhi of the main accused Karan, has also been granted interim relief vide order dated 06.08.2024 passed by this Court in CRM-M- 379902024 titled as 'Preeti alias Manpreet vs. State of Punjab and another'. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for grant of interim relief to the petitioner and undertakes that the petitioner will join the investigation and cooperate with the Investigating Agency.
Notice of motion.
Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State of Punjab.
Learned State Counsel opposes prayer made on behalf of the petitioner and submits that the victim in the present case is only 15 years of age as her date of birth is 06.11.2009 and the date of incident is 21.05.2024. It is submitted that the victim being minor, any consent on her part is immaterial. Learned counsel for the State does not oppose that the coaccused of the petitioner has been granted interim relief vide order dated 06.08.2024 passed by this Court in CRM-M-37990-2024 titled as 'Preeti alias Manpreet vs. State of Punjab and another'.
-3However, learned counsel for the State seeks time to file detailed status report in the matter.
Adjourned to 13.12.2024.
In the meantime, the petitioner is directed to appear before the SHO/Investigating Officer to join investigation and in the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of SHO/Investigating Agency subject to the following conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.:- i.
that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation before the Investigating Officer as and when required;
ii.
that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
iii.
that the petitioner shall not leave the country, without prior permission of the Court and shall surrender his passport, if any.
Meanwhile, State counsel is directed to file an affidavit as to the exact role of the petitioner along with the details of pending FIRs, if any, on or before the next date of hearing."
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 28.08.2024 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigation on 16.09.2024. Short reply dated 11.12.2024 filed by way of an affidavit of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Fatehgarh Churian, Police District Batala on behalf of the respondent-State in Court today is
-4taken on record. A copy thereof has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Sukhdev Singh, confirms that the petitioner has joined investigation on 16.09.2024 and is co-operating with the investigating agency, and no further interrogation is required, at this stage. In view of the above, the order dated 28.08.2024 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute. However, the petitioner will abide by the conditions stipulated under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. He will also join the investigation and cooperate with the investigating agency in case he is required for the same in future as and when called upon to do so. In case at any given point of time hereinafter, it is felt by the investigating agency that the petitioner is required for the investigation but is not cooperating, it will be at liberty to approach this Court for passing appropriate orders.
The petition stands disposed of.
Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. 13.12.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Divyanshi JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No