Roshan Lal v. State Of Punjab And ORS
CWP-967 of 2017 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CWP-967 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.8.2019 Roshan Lal .... Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Present:
Mr. Anupam Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S. Sitta, AAG, Punjab.
*** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J.
Counsel for the petitioner very fairly states that the present writ petition was filed seeking medical reimbursement and during the pendency of the present writ petition, the medical bills submitted by the petitioner has already been reimbursed and no cause of action of the petitioner survives any further. He prays that the present writ petition be disposed of as infructuous. In view of the above, present writ petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) 26.08.2019 JUDGE aarti 1.
Whether speaking/non-speaking?
Yes/No 2.
Whether reportable?
Yes/No