Sonil v. State Of Haryana And Another
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.971 of 2017 Date of decision:19.01.2017 Smt. Sonil ... Petitioner Vs.
State of Haryana and another ... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) The writ petition, in my view, is premature. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court for withdrawal of the present writ petition. Ordered accordingly.
The petitioner is at liberty to appear before the enquiry officer in respect of the allegations levelled against her and lead evidence in support thereof.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE January 19, 2017 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2017.01.19 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh