← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/7095/2018disposed of

Rishi v. State Of Haryana And Others

2018-03-21Mr Justice Jaswant Singh2 pages

CWP-7095-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-7095-2018 Date of Decision: March 21, 2018 Rishi

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

Present:

Mr. J.P. Dhull, Advocate, for the petitioner.

ARUN PALLI, J. (ORAL) Notice of motion.

Mr. R.K. Doon, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Copies furnished. For the nature of order, I propose to pass in the matter, no formal written statements/counter affidavits on behalf of the respondents are indeed necessary, at this stage. Thus, with the consent of the parties, the petition is being disposed of finally.

The petitioner is employed with the respondent-department as Conductor. Pursuant to the order dated 25.10.2016, he was transferred from Kaithal to Faridabad. However, vide a subsequent order, dated 12.07.2017, he was re-transferred to Kaithal. The limited grievance that he has is; that pursuant to an impugned order, dated 16.03.2018 (Annexure P-5), he has again been transferred from Kaithal to Faridabad. It is urged that the petitioner is indeed a victim of multiple transfers, which are in breach of the Prashant Kapoor 2018.03.21 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document transfer policy of the State.

CWP-7095-2018 As opposed to this, learned State counsel submits that in the matter involving similar issues, as regards transfer of the employees of the Transport Department, Haryana, this Court vide order and judgment, dated 12.12.2017, rendered in CWP No. 24190 of 2017 (Dilbag Singh v. State of Haryana and others), had issued comprehensive directions to the department to deal with similar issues. Thus, he submits that the grievance/claim of the petitioner shall be considered in terms thereof and respondents shall pass appropriate orders within two weeks from today. That being so, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing substantive survives in this petition and the same be disposed of in the above terms.

Ordered accordingly.

(ARUN PALLI) JUDGE March 21, 2018 Pkapoor Whether Speaking/Reasoned:

YES / NO Whether Reportable:

YES / NO Prashant Kapoor 2018.03.21 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document