Narinder Chauhan v. The Debts Recovery Tribunal-Iii & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 9791 of 2017 Decided on : 08.05.2017 Narinder Chauhan . . . Petitioner

Versus

The Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Chandigarh and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Atul Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of Certiorari, for setting aside the orders dated 22nd March, 2017 (Annexure P-1), passed by the Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Chandigarh (respondent No.1) on the basis of the orders passed and circulated in the matter of Vikram Bakshi & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Huosing Development Finance Limited & others, dated 20th March, 2017, by the Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi and further impugned actions of respondent No.2 i.e. the Authorized Officer of the Bank.

2.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner states that inadvertently certain relevant documents could not be appended along with the writ petition. He, however, states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action by furnishing better particulars and appending relevant documents.

3.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (RAMENDRA JAIN) May 08, 2017 JUDGE J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jawala Ram 2017.05.11 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh