Neelam And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS

C.W.P. No. 20649 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

C.W.P. No. 20649 of 2024 Date of decision: 27.08.2024 Neelam and another .... Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL

Present:

Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

ARUN PALLI, J (Oral) Having argued the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, for the present, he be permitted to withdraw this petition so as to enable the petitioners to approach the respondent authorities, qua their concerns/grievances, in the first instance. Served with the advance copy of the petition, Mr. Ankur Mittal, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, is present in Court, on behalf of the respondents. At the outset, he, on instructions, submits that the competent authority (District Town Planner, Ambala) shall take cognizance of the concerns/grievances of the petitioners, as set out in the petition and pass necessary orders, in accordance with law. Further, he submits that before any such orders are passed, the petitioners, shall also be heard.

In this regard, they may appear before the District Town Planner, Ambala (respondent No.3), in his office on 09.09.2024 at 11.00 AM. And, necessary orders shall be passed within two weeks thereafter. That being so, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that nothing substantive survives in this petition and the same be disposed of in terms of the statement made by learned State counsel. In the wake of the position sketched out above, and in terms of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, this petition is accordingly disposed of.

DEEPAK KUMAR 2024.08.29 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P & H High Court, Chandigarh

C.W.P. No. 20649 of 2024 This Court is sanguine that the authority shall consider/examine the matter in the right earnest, and pass appropriate orders, within the time indicated above, assigning reasons in support thereof. Needless to assert that this order shall not constitute an expression of opinion on the merits of the case of either party, for, as indicated earlier, the competent authority shall examine the grievances of the petitioners, strictly in accordance with law. (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE 27.08.2024 deepak Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR 2024.08.29 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P & H High Court, Chandigarh