Swati Vashisht v. State Of Haryana And Others
!
!"
#
$%# % $%# &
!" #####
% ' (%) $
& '( ') *'*+ ./0
%
-
% 2 "
& !" *3 '4 *'*+ .*0 1
&
$'
,*0 !" 5&
61
$(47
*
'* ') *'*+ .+0 1
"
'( ') *'*+ ./0
.
!81
2
#* &+,-./""01/,.23. %.4 5-+3"
#,"0046724&6,-5+" 2010 (4) RCR (Civil) 600, whereby it was observed that a quasi judicial order should contain reason. The relevant part of the judgment reads as under:- "51. Summarizing the above discussion, this Court holds:
! "
"
#
" $
#
%
&
$
"
'(
)( ) # !'*+,-.*//01
-2* -2-. (
(
# (
'*++3.*+40
5525677+ 8 9 7//*4:!!3/5 ! 64 ! ;
; o. In all common law jurisdictions judgments play a vital role in setting up precedents for the future.
8
Therefore, for development of law, requirement of giving reasons for the decision is of the essence and is virtually a part of "Due Process".
+ 9 :
29.$)'+4.*'*+
,90-/ &,/1:2+ 3" .,.2 0; ,+<,-, ,-4 0.62+" *$ ') *'*+ / 1&
&
2
"
&"
8
"8
&
29.*'+++.*''3 .$0 " ; **
'
*7<
*7<
.
*$ $* *''3
1
"
&
&
&
%
=
&
>
1 & & 2 .
-/.,&,.,+/,3" .,.20;,+<,-,,-40.62+"
*'$* ,$0 >5 )*3
.
"
& =
!" 61
> ?
&0 5&
$(4)
, 0 1 & = & @ "
" 1
1
"
"
2
"
&
@
" 1 & !"
2 *'$4
&
"
-
A
1 1
1
1 ;
'*
"
.
1
1 1 @
"
& "
& '( ') *'*+ ./0
:
) ; "
" 1
&
"
" 1
( % )
=>=". '
(&) 9
B 9 51 ;