Khuttan @ Bazar Khan v. Balu & ORS.
RSA No. 2668 of 2011 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH RSA No. 2668 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.02.2019 Khuttan @ Bazar Khan ...... Appellant
VERSUS
Ballu and others ..... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present:
None for the appellant.
Mr. Sandeep Jasuja, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 6, 8 & 9.
***** JAISHREE THAKUR, J.(Oral) Consecutive orders reflect that the counsel for the appellant has not been putting in an appearance. By an order dated 09.01.2017, last opportunity had been allowed to the counsel to address arguments. Similar is the order dated 10.03.2017. Subsequently also the case was adjourned on account of nonappearance of counsel for the appellant. By order dated 07.05.2018, proxy counsel had requested for a short adjournment. On the subsequent date, again there was no appearance on behalf of counsel for the appellant and the same is the position today. SATYAWAN 2019.02.01 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
RSA No. 2668 of 2011 -2It seems that the counsel for the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 01.02.2019 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned No.
Whether reportable No.
SATYAWAN 2019.02.01 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document