Raj Kumar v. State Of Punjab And Another

CRM-M-43008-2024 (O&M) 1



    
  
      

 !"#$%$ &'()( 

    


 

     



 '  *+,( ,
-

,
     


!"#$ !  

#
%!""&!

  ' !"#$ !

 ((((( -

,
.( /  ) *  

+
$,-- .

%$ +$ -/01)2)13)+

45 +#6

  

 7 8$  %  +  90-! &

! 

  %    ):3)3

 ; +  90-! &

!


$ ,2)!:3<::0- 
$:
-<
*"$

$  333,="> ?  @ + $ +

  %% $

+ : *  - 8+ 

% $   #    33 3,! $ 

  

     + -10++ .

%  $%   8% $  ,     

 !     ):3 3, 

$#"+


 9%!&

" 

+

CRM-M-43008-2024 (O&M) 2

   #         $$     #  $ $

!8 #    

 + 8   ;  #   $  $

  A0   .   .

 * $  $ 8    %! 8 ; +$ $$ 2 *A++5$ -




   



   

!

"#!+ @%- 

8 
$ , --  ++8  $ %  B$  +$ .

  $8@%- #8 

8

. #   $

+ 88  $  $* 8.

% $  +

 + C @D+
 -$

$







      "

%

!

#% !  #    $     $   #     $

  -!  8 $     ;   -  .

 $ +

$% 8$ $ 

$*+#   

 2E

 %  

B "57. The position that emerges from the above discussion can be summarised thus: the power of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR or complaint in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for compounding the offences under Section 320 of the Code.

CRM-M-43008-2024 (O&M) 3 Inherent power is of wide plenitude with no statutory limitation but it has to be exercised in accord with the guideline engrafted in such power viz; (i) to secure the ends of justice or (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any Court. xxx xxx xxx. "

E 0#8 B % !  %   +-% % $ + +8 = ?  $  ! -  .

%A0 8++ $$ .  ++

 8

      ; $ +   $++* ! +   8+

#  $%  $%     $    

$!$ + $%  $

 #.

 

 + +;!     ++8  $ + $  -/01)2)13) +

 45 +# 6

  

 7 8$ %+ 90-!&

!

  %  ):3)3

;+ 90-!&

!


$ ,2)!:3<::0- 
$:
-<
*"$  ++ $ . + $% .

.  

 $    333, ="> ?! %123#   4 56&  !

%().7 2"4 %$ "$& 8 /

$& 90!

/ 1&". 
 . 8 &"$:

/8;$ 8$& 4/$ " ! &6 & 8( 9.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.   -

,


     ()( 

  
% F

 G%1

   1 F   +     1