Sushila Devi v. State Of Haryana And Another

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.09.12 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-24922-2019 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-24922-2019 (O&M) Date of decision : 09.09.2019 Sushila Devi ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Sunil K. Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for petitioner submits that he will be satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondents to consider the representation dated 02.09.2019 (Annexure P-6) within a stipulated period. Without going into the merits and demerits of the claim of the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 02.09.2019 (Annexure P-6), within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and shall pass a speaking order thereon after affording opportunity of hearing to petitioners and taking into consideration judicial precedents as well, failing which, there shall be costs of `25,000/- to be paid to the petitioner. This condition of imposing costs is only to prevent petitioner to run from pillar to post and avail remedy of contempt in case of noncompliance of directions issued by this Court. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE 09.09.2019 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No