Kirti v. Haryana School Shiksha Pariyojna Parishad And Another

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.09.12 13:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-24989-2019 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-24989-2019 (O&M) Date of decision : 09.09.2019 Kirti ... Petitioner

Versus

Haryana School Shiksha Pariyojna Parishad, Shiksha Sadan and another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Ms. Pratibha Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) Notice of motion.

Ms. Shruti Jain Goyal, DAG, Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent(s)/State and submits that the provisional result of petitioner wrongly mentioned in General Category instead of BCA Category, has already been considered under BCA Category and she was called for scrutiny of documents for 06.09.2019. Necessary action would be taken. In such circumstances, present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and same may be disposed of as such. Ordered accordingly.

( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE 09.09.2019 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No