Sukram Pal v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-48643-2021 Date of Decision : 22.11.2021 Sukram Pal

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Rajat Mor, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Manish Bansal, DAG, Haryana.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J (ORAL) Being aggrieved, the petitioner-accused has come up before this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.111, dated 21.03.2020 under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Hisar, Civil Lines, District Hisar and all other subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present FIR is outcome of order dated 03.10.2019 passed in criminal complaint No.1703 of 2016, filing No.16570 of 2016 under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act titled as 'Suraj Mal vs. Sukram Pal', whereby, the petitioner was declared proclaimed offender.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that a compromise has been effected with the complainant and the original complaint has been withdrawn by the complainant vide order dated 09.07.2020. As such, the proceedings in the FIR captioned above, does not survive anymore. Given above, in the facts and circumstances peculiar to this case, this petition is allowed and the FIR No.111, dated 21.03.2020 under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Hisar, Civil Lines, District Hisar and all other subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed. The petition is allowed with the aforesaid terms. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE November 22, 2021 Manpreet Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MANPREET SINGH 2021.11.25 11:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document