← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaFAO/1368/2017dismissed

National Insurance Co. Ltd v. Joginder Kaur & ORS

2026-04-29Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma15 pages

      

    

 !"#$ #%&'#() "* + ,*

******--)$$# .%* "/!#,)'

0&'

#, "'%*

******)%-"#,)# % )%)'.), "#1 * 2*  '"#"&#(), "#1 3* 2* 

-$",), "#1

4* 4*     

      

1 5 + 6* 6 6  6  

    

     6  6

*



  

 

   !"

#   $  %& ' %'( 

 



  "

   )  ((    *   +&& $

  "

   

 

  ,- " $ $     "

$     

 "  

  ,- "    . %//,'&- # $ 

 (1  "

  #   " 

   #  %  

  "

 

 

  2"

 "  $

 

   

         

 2 

    3 



6 666  +

6+   6 5    6  "

 "

   "  $





7   

 $       8    

"    

 3   

  $        "    / 8   "

  

  ""

  

$

$ # "  

    9   ":

 $  9      :

8       !   ; <#"   8=  )" !

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi

  6   "      9     :

 "



    "    

"        9   " :

, >  "

       

$   "  $

  

 (

        !"

   $     $       6+

+8  6 ?

8=  )" !

   Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another 9

3  6&-'):) "&'

%)%  7   $  $  "  "        "   

      

 !

     

 "#  $   

       %       

&  #$           $   

 !

    $     ' ()*+,  

 -+$'

()*.,  

 ./$ ' ()*0,   

! !

    

 

$      

1 

 $

$023    !

$                    $        



      $      

(, 

 "   

 4$            $     "       

      

   1   $

      $ 

             $      $       

    

 

$       $ 023      !



  023   

% $ 

     

 $        '    $  !



 

2 '    

 "  '

 

* * * * * * 42.   

       #   (.,            ( 

 

     5$  "  #    # ,$       

)6(   )0-2 -)-0 ,$      $ 7')8-/+2 $7')/+) +0 $7')0+/.2 $7')..).0 $ 7')+./02 $     

$ $7'))0)00 $7'90//2 $ 7'8/)/0  7'0//82 

& 8=  )" !

  

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. 9

  6      $  )  (( (4  (&    *   +&&   $ #  @A B      # 7 "

 "  C @;A )   "    #  #  C @!A #   

  

# "  C @BA .   #     "        "

  7 $   C @DA E    #        # $  " < "    7 

      <#"

   952. :  conventional heads $          !

 ;

<

1  ; -0$222  !

$; )$22$222              ;  )$22$222                 

4 !

 ;



 = $       

 $       

$          

          > "  $

  &    : &    

          !$ " $

          

      

   $ !         

$  

 "

 "

       &    $    

               "       $  "   !    1                       $    $       $          !

      ; )0$222$ ; .2$222 ; )0$222  

   

  

     

?    ' & '

 "         &               )23

               

@ @ @ @ @ 59.3    $  023  

      $     

   .2 $   

  +23$   

  .202  1      02/2 $   )03

:

   

  !

59.4 1    '  (,

 !

$  .23

          

.2  :  -03  

  .202  )23      02/2         

                 !

 

59.5 4  

$   !

$     

+2+-

A     

59.6.    

    

    

 A C     

 .-   

59.7     

 



59.8 ;      $  $  $    !

      ;  )0$222$  ;  .2$222    ;  )0$222   

 

     )23    +

8=  )" !

   /:

)#)'$ #%&'#() ":-#;

+!:! ), <%* #& :

$!% =&='& :

 =)'%   6     #

6'$ <)':

%&-'  '#;

6) =!

6&-'    $ # #  "

.    "    

E21 :#  ? # F

<         

             1  

$  G G   

         

  G 

 G$  G

   G$    G

 G        

$   $   $  $   $    

  $     

   $     !  

  

-) ) Spousal consortium 

   



 

  '

  

       G

$  $  $  $

     G

-) - Parental consortium    

  

$ G



$

 $   $    $   

$     

G

-) + Filial consortium           

            

:         "  

 

 

   

         #     $

 $



   



 #      

              

7     '      H  !   

           7         



     

                

 

     $

 $  



    7 A  :   

 

      

$  

 1  

          $             $  

     

    

  F   

             

         : : % # 

    % $             

              

        

 

   

  

  



   G  G

  F

< 1   $ 





 

  $ ;.2$222  

 

'

  

"# $     $ 

/4

    "    

 

  #

  #     ,4  #

   "        $  )        !"



"   

3   # 

  "

  "    "

    

  #

3

   

   D7 !?

   F ) #   

 <" 

D7 !% $  

   $ 

3  # # 

  

  #

  "

"    $  

 

  # 

    #  

 # #

"   



 " % So far as the contention raised by learned counsel for the appellant-Insurance Company that the learned Tribunal committed an error in law by awarding compensation separately under the heads of "loss of consortium" as well as "loss of love and affection" is concerned, the said submission merits acceptance.

4

 8=  )" !

V. Pathmavathi and Others v.

Bharti AXA General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Another, 2026 INSC 131  

    #   $  # "     

 7 !  # 

  9     :

 

      "    "   " $  

    " $ 

        "

!2   "           

""





  7   "

   E-- 1;

( ,$ # E     D         $       '



       

       % $ #    ?   F

 ( ,  !





     ;

 ( ,     

                  $

$  $         !

        

   



    $ F

( , I 0-  :     $        !

 ;

J;



;

 

$(-2)+,9 ##0.K 1  ;-0$222      !

$  ;  )$22$222          ;)$22$222                 !



;

J;

 ;

 

$(-2)+,9 ##0.K 

= J

=   1 #

L $(-2)-,/ ##.-)K$    

   $ 

$          

    > "  $

  &    : &    

          !$ " $

         

       

   $       !           

$   

 "

 "

 

&  $

  

  "   $  "   !    1      $  $  $         !

       ;  )0$222$  ; .2$222 ;)0$222  

 

  

     

?    ' & '  "          &                 )23





             -+  &     F

 ( , M

 

  #  ?  

  ?  :  $ # 

     -.



$           !   E  D  

      

  $            ' 

   !

    1 

   

     

 $    

                  $  

  #

N11: 

            

%,

  7



)

@A $  " 

   



        % $  $  $               

         

 E  D  

          

$   

           

 -/ 1  ! &  #

7  O 1 # L   ;

)8     #!

 E D

 

 

 $

"                 



" (-2)6,)6 ##)+2  !

      E D E    D

   

 ?    I

  -)  :  #    ?       #   F

J 1 # L  F

$(-2)8,)/ ## /62K        

          1 

$E D         

  E    D$  E



 D$ E

 D

      

$ $ $ $ $    $  

  

   $      !     IJ;

 ;



$(-2)+,9 ##0.K -) )

       

       



 

  '

          E

$   $  $  $

 

  D J?

"HL =  (0 $)989, K -) - F       

       

$        E



$

 $   $    $   

$     

D -) + 4

   

           :

        "

 

 

   

 

        

#     $  $



   

 -- #  

    

      

7      '    

 H        !               

     7          

     



       

 



      $  $  



   -+ 7A  : 

  



     

$    

 1  

      $   $

     

                  

  F   

    

     : :

 % # 

    J;

  % # M 

;

  ;

$-2)8 ## L ;

+6.6P> " %  #  ;

;



F  Q $-2)+ ##L >-.+0P Q  "

 %   #   L "      # # $)99/ ##L Q 8.K % $    

     

 

  -.

   

  

  



   E  D

  F

1

 $ 





    $ ; .2$222   

  -8 1  $  



-07  O

1  ( ,

; 62$222*'





 $ #

; )$22$222*'

      -6 7 $  > 1

1 #

L 

2

Q )6$ 'M? #    



   F

 ( , 7 

O 1 ( ,  

            ;     

  F

 ( ,$ #         

 $ 

$       $           

!

  :  $

  7  O

1  ( ,$ #    

   

   $

 

  1              





 #    I (-2-),)) #862 +.

:  $       

   $   



  % # 

         

 #  ?  F

J

1 # L  F

$(-2)8,)/ ##/62K$                         

   R       $        !

 17  O J7 

O 1 # L   ;

$(-2)6,)6 ##)+2K$  #        

    $

  $    

  L        +0   % #  

        $                     



4         

  -9 #   

       $ #  

  #  ?  F

 ( ,$  E    D

           :  &    

Q ( ,$ F

( ,

7  O 1 ( ,$'



 

      

   E D #& $ 



     

  / $        "   Hon'ble Supreme Court, the award of compensation granted by the learned Tribunal under the separate head of "loss of love and affection" cannot be sustained in law. Accordingly, the amount awarded by the Tribunal under the said head is liable to be deducted from the total compensation. 15.

A perusal of the record further reveals that no compensation is awarded under the head of loss of estate and compensation awarded under the head of loss of consortium is on the lower side, which warrants enhancement. 16.

In view of the above discussion, the present appeal is dismissed being devoid of any merit.

17.

Pending application (s) if any also stands disposed of.

6  6

 

3* 2*  O  :

G 3 #-3 # 

H-

G  



H-