Rajesh Shah Alias Rajesh Show v. State Of Punjab
# $%&%!'( ))
* * +* * * ,
- .&/&
*
(
0+ ) *
11111
! "# $% 11111
)
% &
'() )
* !+
,-(- -.-
01
0,%2
&
3+4
4 # %2
# ! %2
+ $+!
.-.-# !
# #
+
% "&5 " 6 7
4 # #
) 8" + % 2
59# #
$+! .-.-
+ # 2
05 +++
-.-
:
-.-
%
"&5
! %
#
2
+ !
-.-
0,:
# # !
,-(-
01
+
!#%
&
,) );
!
# )
0
* 2 %!
#
29 %!
#
+
% ! % %
! %2+ + !
2 6 #
+
#
% : %!
$+! %2 ) )0 0(((
-- <: & + ;!
& + = >
!
%
,--
&
2 -- %2 #2
& + &72&
&%7
; )!" 6 # 7
4
4 :!6
1
%!
! ) "
& 25
%2! #
# ?
%
2 % %2 !9
#
)
'
"&5 ,-
+ ! ! &:@ &
" 6 #
# 2
2
!+ $7
7 % !
-.- : It is apposite make a reference to the judgment of :
A% 4 &
'% *%'34
! 4 .& 5)
)9.. &)',.# # 0
!!
!!
!!
" !
"!!
!!
! !!
#
$
# !!
!!
% !!
!
!
$ & '
()
) !)
)
*
!!
!!
!!
"!
+
!
$ !!
!!
$
$ , )
)
#!
)
*
!!
# !
- !
$$ ./ *
!!
!!
.0
!!
! !!
$
- !
$$
./".0
!
!!
!
!
1
$
! !!
!
- #!
!!
! !!
$
$
%$
" *
$
$
)
$
$
$
-
$
!!
"!
!
!
!
-
$
$$
& '
()
!!
!
!
!!
!!
! = +
!
# ##
+)
% "&5#
%
! %2 )
' )
"&5 ,-
+ ! &:@ &
" 6 # +
# 2!+ $ 7
7 % !
-.-
%
# ! %$ /
%
9
%
+
#%2
)
B
0
:
C%4 &
9
D "%6
'! 4 .
5& /'&4%7
'! 4 .
9 .( &) '- <8
2#
+
2 # /
!# %
4
%! + #
2
% !
! !
+ 8
% 2
2
$ ! 2 %
= +
#:
A%4 &
*4 %84 /8 4 .
'! 4 .
5&)
'#4.
.
# &4 --.&))E( %
<#
! $+!
: + ) #
: + ) 4 A
! %
+4
9
%
!=
:) /./3 '
;
! 4 .& -&)
<) =>
</ > */< .%' '# '
!7%$
'! 4 . & (1-
-
-(-:
C%4 &
9 "It is well settled that if the accused does not appear through counsel appointed by him/her, the Court is obliged to proceed with the hearing of the case only after appointing an amicus curiae, but cannot dismiss the appeal merely because of nonrepresentation or default of the advocate for the accused (see Kabira vs. State of Uttar Pradesh 1981 (Supp) SCC 76 and Mohd. Sukur Ali vs. State of Assam (2011) 4 SCC 729)," noted the Division Bench. 4 ) +
!
%
# #
%
!
% %2
%
)
+ 2 %
2%
% # 5
#
# +
+ %2
+%
%2 !!
%
!
# #
+ "&5)
%#
!%2 )
')
"&5 9 #
2
!
$+!
%
6%
$
2
)
$ # % *2 ! )
! %2 + +
2
%!
* 2
# 4
,-(- -.-
01
0,%2
&
3+ 4
4 %2 4 %
+ !% )
!
+
# #
$ ;= .
?
2 3 *
$4
5 (
4' ! 5 (
4'