Shantanu Singh v. State Of Haryana And Others

    
 

$%&'( &)*+*', - -

 ./$,%$,0.*,1/   2-&%*%*',&3 4&3+0+ .%$%&'($35$,$$,6%/&3+  -----&+7',6&,%+ 8 9-.99 8 9-.4: 9 

 



 


 
 

 







 



  

 

 
 
!

 
 


 


"#
 $ 

 

 

&
'



 

 
 (  &
 



) 
 * 



"


'



)
 *  
"&  
"

&

  ++++
4: 9;- , -





 

&
 ,. 

/%
  &
0 




1

$ 2
&34
2

 


$









&

&


&
 2
&
 *

$ 2
&


&
2
 
*

$$ 
2&

 
 %

(


 

&
 ,. ,

,. !
* 



 

%

(



2 
$
*

 
 

&


*
&
0
&
&
*4
-



 *


& 





 
 

$ 
$

$




 ( /5 /
0 6&
784



6 &

₹10,90,000/- (plus 18% G.S.T.) would be incurred on repair of the damaged house. 2.

Notice of motion was issued on 29.11.2022 and on 28.04.2023, status quo with regard to construction was ordered to be maintained. 3.

On 31.05.2023, for house of respondent No.5 was not being constructed on stilts, stay qua him was vacated and he was permitted to continue with the construction. A sum of ₹5,00,000/- was also offered to be deposited by respondent No.5, which was accepted by the Court and he was directed to deposit the same within a period of one week.

The said order reads as under:-


      

! 

 "    # $#

 

& &

'&#  !

!

(   & #

)* #"+  ,  -# #'  .

         /   &    0

#  0  '   0 



'#



1 0  /   &    2  

, 3

 ,  -#  /

 "

''     #,# & 00 "  4       !, &   

&   2

,3

,  -#, "

#

 #&  

 &  ' 



   "

 56*#  .!78   " #0& #  4 

0 



0 -0 000 # "    &   #    2 

4 #' 

' "&

- 

'

 9  &

-

'  #0        

#          

 0 ' 

' # 

0   # 

   !   -#  

'     &   &   ' &  & *    # #  "  &    &    #     #  &       0 ,&  # 0 "  4#'   -0    

         '0& #

  /    &0  0  

" 6*# .!7,& & #0

    &  #0 '



'    0 &

-   

       &  

 ,  

,  " #    '

 

,

  0 # ' 4 



" &  0 "

      

   0

''          ',     " 

      

   0  &

&'



' /

56*#

.80"3 # )0 & # 0   &     & 

 0     &0  " ' 0        #   -   '0

 #'   4# 



#' ,& 

     !0 " 1# 



 &  # $# 0 0

              

-   ! #' . !,

,

7& ' "

.0 :   ,   '   #  '0 #    #0    ,  '

# #    ;0  "&   ", &   



 0 !$#

,3

,  -#,&   #&  0

 , "  6

0, 

  '

    *   

!, &   &      2

, 3

 ,  -#   ' 

# & 

  /    . !,

,

7    &     &-

'  # 0 

&

, &#  '   "

! 

  0





  

     <

4.

Thereafter, the matter remained pending and during the numerous hearings, experts were also appointed to examine the house and assess the damage. Some reports have also come on record. As per one survey report dated 02.05.2023 (Annexure P-13), the cost to be incurred on the repair of the damaged house has been estimated at ₹31,87,400/-.

5.

Today, during the course of arguments, the petitioner and respondents No.4 and 5 arrived at an amicable settlement. It has been decided that respondent No.4 would pay a sum of ₹25,00,000/- (Twenty Five Lakhs) to the petitioner within a period of 02 weeks from today which would enable the petitioner to get the damaged house repaired. Out of the sum of ₹5,00,000/- deposited by respondent No.5, parties have decided that a sum of ₹2,50,000/- shall be payable to the petitioner and the remaining amount i.e. ₹2,50,000/- shall be refunded to respondent No.5 within a period of 02 weeks.

6.

Learned counsel representing the parties state that the matter in hand be disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties during the course of hearing and also submit that parties shall remain bound by the said settlement arrived at between them.

7.

For the reasons aforementioned, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties. The parties shall be bound by the settlement and in case of any violation, the aggrieved party shall be at liberty to move an application to get the instant petition revived. !99#   !4: 9#        - -