← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/22823/2022disposed of

M/S Shiv Shakti Stone Crusher Ii v. State Of Haryana And Others

2022-10-12The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Arun Palli1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-22823-2022 (O&M) Date of decision:- 12.10.2022 M/s Shiv Shakti Stone Crusher II, Village Pichopa Kalan, Tehsil and District Charkhi Dadri.

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI SHANKER JHA, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

Present:

Mr. Maninder Singh Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Deepak Balyan, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, Ms. Khushaldeep Kaur, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 and 3.

* * * * RAVI SHANKER JHA, C.J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this petition, the policy, on the basis of which the impugned order levying the environment compensation was passed, has been modified. In such circumstances, the petitioner may be granted liberty to approach the authorities for re-determination of the environment compensation, in accordance with the modified policy, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 submits that he has no objection to the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner. In case, the petitioner files an application for re-determination of environment compensation in accordance with the modified policy, the authorities would consider and decide the same, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

In view of the aforesaid statements made by learned counsel for the parties, which are taken on record, and in terms thereof, the petition stands disposed of.

(RAVI SHANKER JHA) CHIEF JUSTICE (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE 12.10.2022 Amodh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No AMODH SHARMA 2022.10.18 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document