M/S Dhuri Plastic Private Limited v. The Joint Commissioner Central Goods And Service Tax Ludhiana

RASHMI 2024.08.28 15:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-20824-2024 -23.

We have carefully considered the submissions raised by counsel for the petitioner at bar and also perused the interim reply filed by the petitioner, which reflects that the petitioner has full knowledge about the suppliers, whose registration was already cancelled with retrospective effect. It is not his case that he has no knowledge about such suppliers. Petitioner has not answered on merits, and has tried to submit vague reply raising issues and claiming documents relating to the other suppliers, which are not necessary for the purpose of filing of the reply. 4.

We are not impressed by the arguments addressed by counsel for the petitioner.

5.

Accordingly, present writ petition stands dismissed. 6.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

    

 
    



   
   RASHMI 2024.08.28 15:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document