Resham Singh & ORS. v. Kashmir Kaur & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH RSA No.3406 of 2011 Date of Decision.28.08.2015 Resham Singh and others .......Appellants

Versus

Kashmir Kaur and others ......Respondents

Present:

Mr. Raj Kumar Kakkar, Advocate for for the appellants.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The only point of law that arises for consideration is whether the plaintiff who filed a suit for declaration on the ground that he had prescribed tile by adverse possession could maintain such an action. On reference made to the Division Bench from this Court in Vijay Bhwar and others Vs. Ajaib Singh (deceased) through legal heirs in R.S.A. No.2561 of 1985, it has been held that the plaintiff cannot maintain such an action. The point which is raised in the second appeal on the basis of which the plaintiff sought for decree and obtained decree, later reversed in appeal stands fully answered by the Division Bench and there is nothing further to be done now. 2.

The second appeal is dismissed.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 28, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.09.01 15:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document