High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/24229/2021disposed of

Sukhdev Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

2021-12-09Mr. Justice Harminder Singh Madaan2 pages

CWP No.24229 of 2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.24229 of 2021 DATE OF DECISION :- December 09, 2021 Inspector Sukhdev Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Kamaldip Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. *** Petitioner Inspector Sukhdev Singh, serving in Punjab Police, by way of filing the present writ petition against respondents State of Punjab through its Secretary, Department of Home, Chandigarh, The DGP, Punjab Police, Chandigarh, The ADGP, Govt. Railway Police, Punjab, Patiala, The AIG, Govt. Railway Police Punjab, Patiala and The S.S.P, Faridkot craves for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the claim for seniority from the date of promotion has Head Constable i.e. 7.9.1989 and for being granted further deem date promotions and seniority in the rank of ASI, S.I. and Inspector with all consequential benefits.

According to him, he had got served a legal notice dated 16.8.2021 (Annexure P-14) upon the respondents but that has not evoked any response, as such he has approached this Court by way of filing the present writ petition. Since the legal notice got served by the petitioner upon the respondents is not said to have been finally disposed of by them in order to enable the respondents to consider the claim of petitioner and then to take PARVINDER SINGH 2021.12.09 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No.24229 of 2021 appropriate action, if need be and further to avoid unnecessary litigation, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No. 2 to consider the legal notice got served by the petitioner, copy Annexure P-14 in accordance with law, rules, regulations and instructions on the subject within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of the order and if some action in the matter is warranted then the needful be done in accordance with law. A speaking order in that regard be passed, which be conveyed to the petitioner as per Registered A.D. Post. If the petitioner feels dissatisfied after passing of the order then he may approach the Court again in accordance with law. (H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE December 09, 2021 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2021.12.09 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document