Sahil Alias Sahil Chawla v. State Of Haryana And Another
!"#$!%&'&"()**+
) ,- * . . .
!"#
$ #
%
&
" '
. . /*
(
)*' +
,-./0 1
#4#56 " ')/
') '7')0 9,3
)78 )'7 )8.
)8*)., 6
,*870 16 23 #
$ : ; $# 4
# # + ( ++
,'
7* '7') 0 9'3
(
" '
'
#
+ ,'
'< 777=9
> #+ (
/
(
7- ,7 '7')
# ;
$ ( " ,
#
-1-
)
Contends that matter has been amicably settled between the parties, i.e. petitioner as well as respondent No.2; hence FIR in question as well as consequential proceedings deserve to be quashed. <
:
" ' #
(
Still further, learned State Counsel, on instructions from the police officer present, is not averse in case the above FIR along with consequential proceedings are quashed and set aside on the basis of the compromise entered into between the parties i.e. petitioner well as respondent No.2.
7.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the paperbook. *
9
?
# + '* 7* '7') # 9
! "#" "#$ "$ #%$ #$ %&
$ &#"$ '
( )$ * '
+,- .&/
0 1$ ( 11 &"" +,- ./ 1 2 3 $ 4 '
5( '1 $ ,,6$ 7 8
0
8 1 ) 1 1 8 03 4
3$ ,(
8 0
$ 3 ) 1 0
11$ 0 !":" -2-
;*8 4
$ ( ( 1 0 $
1 0 -
$ & 9 10
8
0
1 +/ 8
( 0
1; 1 < 11 0
$ ( 8 8 ! 1 2
( (1
8
0 9 $
&=&""
0
08 > 08
5 ?
-
In terms of aforesaid order, statements of both the parties were recorded and a report dated 19.09.2024 has been received from @ #
5 $. For reference, the operative part of report reads as under:- 9 7@0 5 0 A 7 8 7
1 B & 10
8
0
1 +/ 8
( 0
1; 1C , , 1 ,
$ D 2 &"=;9$ .&! '
$ 8 1
, 3 '1
0
1 8
( 0
1 -3-
< 11 0
$ ( 8 8 C , , 1 0 $
11 ( 8 A 8 !
1 2
( (1
8
, , 1 ,
$ D 2 &"=;9$ .&!$ '
$ ;
1
( ( 8
0 , 9
. ?
A perusal of the aforesaid extract clearly reveals that matter has been compromised by both sides with their free consent, voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Even before this Court also, there is no objection by either side against each other. ,7
2( + & (.&(012*. !"#3(4 5/
.
/ 9 #& 9
1 1 0( 0 11 B 7
1
1
- 5 1 ( 1
1 !" 8 1 0
0 - (E B +/ 5$ +/ ( 0 8
1
1
8 0 - (1
( 1 8 0 0 7($ 0 - $ 7
1
(
(8 1 7 1
(8 3 1$ $ 8$ 0
8 (
(1 (1@ 1
( -4-
(
( 1 8 1
8$ 8 11 0 (1
3 ( , 11 08 0 ( 3
8$ F ( 8 0 1
( (
D 1
( ( 1
1
8 (
( $
8 1 11
$
$ 1 $ ( $
3
1 18
8$ 1 8 0
8 (
( ( 8 $ 7
1 8 1
($ 0 11 0 (1$ 0 8 ( 1 0 1
5 -1 5 0 1 08 1
1 1 11 (1 $ 7
1 0 8 5 1
1
1 0
1 11 0 (1 5$
1
0( +/ 1 ($ 7
0
5 1
?
,,
In view of above discussion, this Court is fully convinced that the offence is entirely personal in nature and does not involve public funds. Thus, quashing of the FIR in question along with consequential proceedings, on the basis of compromise would bring peace and harmony to secure the ends of justice.
,'
4
A 56# 4
# # + 4
/(!
+ '7 777=9 (
!(# B+
C -5-
" /.,8.'7-8,/ 65 ?6"77<7/78 +
? 6 !(D# ? #
# 03
**+
. .
-6-