Surender v. Haryana Vidyut Parsaran Nigam Ltd. And ORS










 






 








 











!

"#$#%&
''(



)








*'

 





+$'

 
+ 
 ) 
,
-,

 )











'''

) )

 ./

,)








*'

 





+$'
 
+ 
 ) 
,
-,

 )















'''

) )

 ,&
 0-
, '
 )
, 
)-


  

             





      !  





1111


, 
)-2

3 -4

"

#     $%   $&      $   &   ' ($$)  *'
%+,-,.%+,+-   +   /  &   ++.0++1 *   2  (& direction to respondents to regularize him in service w.e.f. 29.07.2011.

MANOJ KUMAR 2025.02.14 18:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

 





 ./

3.

The petitioner claims that he was regularized in terms of judgment dated 20.05.2015 passed in CWP-2326 of 2011 titled as 'Chhabi Lal and others Vs. State of Haryana and others' and judgment dated 10.10.2017 passed in LPA No. 1700 of 2015 titled as 'HVPNL and others Vs. Chhabi Lal and others'. He was regularized along with other similarly situated employees. The other employees have been regularized notionally w.e.f. 29.07.2011 though cash benefits are extended from the date of joining as regular Peon/Sweeper. The petitioner on the ground of parity deserves notional regularization w.e.f. 29.07.2011.

4.

Faced with order dated 16.12.2020 (Annexure P-8) passed in the case of similarly situated employees and order dated 14.07.2022 (Annexure P-3) passed in the case of petitioner,    





 $  *  )

     ".

"+ +,+, 

    *   &&  
.

  2)( $        4

$)5   





"- ,+ +,+3





5, 
)-6








 

' (&0 607    ' $   607





MANOJ KUMAR 2025.02.14 18:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document