High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/8841/2018disposed of

Dr. Sudarshan Rathee v. State Of Haryana And Others

2019-10-16Mr. Justice Amit Rawal2 pages

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.22 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-8841-2018 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8841-2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 16.10.2019 Sudarshan Rathee ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. R. Kartikeya, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Rajkapoor Malik, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 and 5.

**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) CM-6205-2019 For the reasons stated in the application, which is supported by an affidavit, reply on behalf of respondent No.3 is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.

CM stands disposed of.

CM-14268-2019 For the reasons stated in the application, which is supported by an affidavit, Annexure R-3/4 is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.

CM stands disposed of.

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.22 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-8841-2018 (O&M) MAIN CASE Claim in present writ petition is for appointment to the post of Principal in terms of Advertisement dated 23.06.2017. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner has already attained 60 years of age i.e. age of superannuation. The factum of petitioner having attained the age of 60 years could not be controverted by Mr. R. Kartikeya, learned counsel representing the petitioner.

Keeping in view the aforementioned facts, grievance of petitioner, in present writ petition, no longer subsists. No ground is made out for interference. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.

( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE 16.10.2019 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No