Yudhbir @ Tinku v. State Of Haryana

-1CRM-M-38694 of 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38694 of 2019 Date of Decision: 17.01.2020 Yudhbir alias Tinku

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present:- Mr. Sanjeev Kadian, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Chetan Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Through this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of regular bail to petitioner - Yudhbir alias Tinku in a case arising from FIR No.328 dated 06.07.2018 registered under Sections 307, 120-B, 34 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station Beri, District Jhajjar.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner is in long custody since 07.07.2018. All the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile. Conclusion of trial may take a sufficient long time. No useful purpose would be served by detaining the petitioner in jail any more. Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Ram Pal, admitted the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. Considering overall facts and circumstances, but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed. Consequently, petitioner - Yudhbir alias Tinku is ordered to be released on RAVINDER SINGH 2020.01.20 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

-2CRM-M-38694 of 2019 bail during pendency of trial, if not required in any other case, on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned.

(RAMENDRA JAIN) January 17, 20.20 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2020.01.20 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document