Daulat Ram Maghar Ram v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Patiala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

ITA No. 407 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: 3.2.2016 Daulat Ram Maghar Ram, Bhawanigarh ....Appellant.

Versus

Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala

...Respondent.

1.

Whether the Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG.

PRESENT: Mr. Divya Suri, Advocate for the appellant. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.

1.

There is a delay of 128 days in filing the appeal. CM No. 23983-CII of 2015 has been filed for condonation of 128 days' delay in filing the appeal. Since the appeal has been dismissed on merits vide a common order of even date passed in ITA No. 396 of 2015, no further orders are required to be passed in the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal and the same is disposed of as such. 2.

For orders, see ITA No. 396 of 2015 (Gurdev Agro Engineers, Bhawanigarh v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala). (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE February 3, 2016 (RAJ RAHUL GARG) gbs JUDGE GURBACHAN SINGH 2016.04.01 16:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh