Satpal v. Sunita

2023:PHHC:120512-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH FAO-2646-2017 (O&M) Decided on 13.09.2023 Satpal

...Petitioner

versus Sunita ....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR PRESENT:.

Ms. Vandana Rani, Advocate for the appellant.

**** RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) On 05.07.2023 following order was passed:- "Learned counsel for the appellant pleads no instructions on behalf of the appellant.

On previous occasion, learned counsel for the appellant submitted before the Court on the basis of some unverified information that the appellant has passed away. He showed his inability to confirm the aforesaid fact for which the concerned SHO was directed to confirm the alleged death of the appellant.

A status report has been received by way of affidavit of Sh. Sumer Singh SI, Station House Officer, Police Station Sadar Hansi wherein it has been deposed that the appellant is still alive.

Since learned counsel for the appellant pleads no instructions, therefore, let actual date notice be sent to the appellant returnable on 13.09.2023."

RIYA 2023.09.15 12:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

FAO-2646-2017 (O&M) -22023:PHHC:120512-DB Today, Ms. Vandana Rani, Advocate appears and files her vakalatnama on behalf of the appellant, the same is taken on record. She submits that the appellant is very much alive and has instructions to withdraw the present appeal.

In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the appellant, present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. A communication be sent to the office of learned counsel for the respondent as well.

(RAJ MOHAN SINGH) JUDGE (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE September 13, 2023 Riya Whether reportable Yes/No Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No RIYA 2023.09.15 12:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document