Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Mohali v. Hardip Kaur Gill

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Regular First Appeal No. 3225 of 2013 (O&M) Reserved On: 06.02.2025 Pronounced On: 25.02.2025 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, Mohali ... Appellant(s)

Versus

Hardip Kaur Gill ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. R.S Khosla, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aman Sharma, Mr. Chirag Suri and Mr. Yogender Verma, Advocates, for the appellant-GMADA.

Mr. Naresh Kaushal and Mr. Nitish Kaushal, Advocates for the landowners.

Mr. Shailendra Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Munish Sharma, Advocate for the appellants (In CM-519-CI-2021and RFA-4491-2013) Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate for Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for the appellants (In RFA-1124-2013, RFA-1125-2013, RFA-1126-2013, RFA-1409-2013 to RFA-1423-2013, RFA-1424-2013 to RFA-1426, RFA-1988-2013, RFA-19892013, RFA-2283-2013 to RFA-2286-2013, RFA-2288-2013, RFA-2289-2013, RFA-2465-2013 and RFA-2466-2013. Mr. Tarunveer Vashist, Advocate Mr. Shoryaveer Vashisht, Advocate for the appellants in RFA-4610-2013, RFA-4612-2013, RFA4614-2013, RFA-4618-2013 and RFA-4619-2013. Mr. Manoj Pundir and Mr. Kuldeep Rathee, Advocates for the appellant (In RFA-821-2014) and for the respondents/landowner (In RFA-1460 of 2014). Mr. Sandeep Dhiman, Advocate for the appellants (In RFA-202-2014 and RFA-203-2014, RFA-4213-2016, RFA-4261-2016 and RFA-1410-2017).

Mr. Nirmal Jangra, Advocate for Mr. Deepak Girotra, Advocate for the appellant (In RFA-3514-2018).

Mr. Ashish Grover, Advocate for the appellant in RFA-2258-2014 to RFA-2262-2014 and RFA-2434-2014 and RFA-1707-2015.

Mr. Raj Kumar Rathore, Advocate Mr. Kuldeep Rathore, Advocate for the respondents No. 1, 3 and 4 (In RFA-3231-2013) and for respondents No. 1 to 3.

Mr. Ishan Kaushal, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Anil Kshetarpal, J.

1.

Factual Background 1.1 With the consent of learned counsel representing the parties, a batch of around 484 regular first appeals, the detail whereof is given at the foot of the judgment, shall stand disposed of by a common order. 1.2 These cross appeals have been filed by the landowners as well as the Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as "GMADA"), the beneficiary of the acquisition. The assessment of the market value of the acquired land is the only issue arising in all these appeals.

1.3 The relevant and necessary details of the acquisition are as under:- S.No.

Date Particulars Details 1.

23.01.2004 Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1894 Act") was published for proposing Proposing to acquire the land for planned development and for setting up of the residential Urban Estate, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali, which is now a district. The details of the land sought to be acquired in the following five villages is as under:- Village Area of land Raipur Khurd 13.69 Acres

S.No.

Date Particulars Details Chilla 276.25 Acres Mauli Baidwan 103.56 Acres Kumbra 22.60 Acres Manauli 1.29 Acres Total Land 417.39 Acres 1.4 The learned counsel representing the parties are ad idem that the cases arising from village Manauli are not a part of this batch. 1.5 The declaration under Section 6 of the 1894 was published on 18.01.2005. Through different awards for each of four villages, the Land Acquisition Collector (hereinafter referred to as "the LAC') on 26.12.2006 assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ₹40,00,000/- per acre. 1.6 Being dissatisfied with the award of the LAC, the landowners requested for referring the matter to the Reference Court (hereinafter referred to as "the RC"). The various reference petitions were decided by the RC in various bunches. The RC has assessed the market value of the acquired land in respect of four villages, namely Chilla, Mauli Baidwan, Kumbra and Raipur Khurd and the tabulated compilation thereof is extracted as under:- Sr.

No.

Date of judgment passed by the RC Name of the Village Market Value assessed by the RC per acre (In ₹) 1.

11.12.2012 Chilla 53,39,639/- 2.

11.12.2012 Mauli Baidwan 71,40,000/- 3.

26.03.2013 Kumbra 71,40,000/- 4.

16.04.2013 Raipur Khurd 53,39,639/- 1.7 The landowners as well as GMADA have assailed the correctness of the market value assessed by the RCs in various awards. The landowners claim that the market value of the acquired land was not less than ₹5,00,00,000/- per acre. The GMADA on the other hand claims that the

RCs have erred in assessing the market value. 1.8 In Regular First Appeal No. 4608 of 2013, the landowners have filed an application for additional evidence. They wish to produce the various RC's awards assessing the market value of acquired land by different notifications in villages, namely Manakmajra and Kambala. 2.

Evidence produced by the respective parties 2.1 In all these cases, the following witnesses have been examined in oral evidence:- Sr. No.

Name of the Witness Particulars of the Witness Village Chilla 1.

PW.1 Sushil Kumar Attri Claimant 2.

PW.2 Paramjit Singh Senior Assistant 3.

PW.3 Jaswinder Singh -- 4.

PW.4 Gurdev Singh -- 5.

PW.5 Pal Singh -- Village Mauli Baidwan 6.

PW.1 Jaspal Singh Applicant 7.

PW.2 Harmail Singh Lambardar 8.

PW.3 Karnail Singh -- 9.

PW.4 Bachittar Singh -- 10.

PW.5 Gurdev Singh -- 11.

PW.6 Paul Singh -- Village Kumbra 12.

PW.1 Gian Singh -- 13.

PW.2 Sadhu Singh 14.

PW.3 Amar Singh 15.

PW.4 Parkash Singh Patwari Village Raipur Khurd 16.

PW.1 Mansa Singh -- 17.

PW.2 Jaspal Singh -- 18.

PW.3 Bachittar Singh -- 19.

PW.4 Amar Singh -- 2.2 Except the sale deeds, the parties have produced the following documentary evidence:-

Sr. No.

Exhibit Number Description of the document Village Chilla 1.

Ex.C17 Copy of Award No. 502 dated 29.05.2009 2.

Ex.C18 Copy of schedule for proceedings of land acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act.

3.

Ex.C19 Site Plan 4.

Ex.C20 Site Plan 5.

Ex.C21 Site Plan 6.

Ex.C22 Copy of the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2007 7.

Ex.C23 Letter dated 21.11.2006 of PUDA 8.

Ex.C25 Copy of award No. 33 dated 09.04.2008 9.

Ex.C26 Copy of Valuation of Existing structures of Karnail Singh 10.

Ex.C27 Copy of Plan showing the existing structure of Karnail Singh 11.

Ex.C28 Copy of Valuation of Existing structures of Amarjit Singh 12.

Ex.C29 Copy of Plan showing the existing structure of Amarjit Singh 13.

Ex.C30 Copy of Plan showing the existing structure of Sher Singh 14.

Ex.C31 Copy of Valuation of Existing structures of Sher Singh 15.

Ex.C32 Copy of Plan showing the existing structure of Manmohan Singh 16.

Ex.C33 Letter dated 21.11.2006 of PUDA 17.

Ex.C34 Copy of Minutes of Meeting 18.

Ex.C36 Copy of Memorandum for Council of Ministers dated 14.11.2006 19.

Ex.CX Copy of Award No. 522 Dated 15.11.2011 Village Mauli Baidwan 20.

Ex.P7 Letter Dated 08.12.2021 21.

Ex.P8/Ex.P9/ Ex.P10/Ex.P11 Copy of Notification dated 19.01.2004 22.

Ex.P12 Copy of Award No. 522 dated 15.11.2011 23.

Ex.P13 Copy of Award No. 523 dated 15.11.2011 24.

Ex.P14 Copy of Award No. 524 dated 15.11.2011 25.

Ex.P15 Copy of Award No. 525 dated 15.11.2011 26.

Ex.P16 Copy of Award No. 526 dated 15.11.2011 27.

Ex.PW.3/A Allotment Letter dated 11.10.2005 28.

Ex.PW.3/B Allotment Letter dated 23.08.2007

Sr. No.

Exhibit Number Description of the document Village Kumbra 29.

Ex.P6 Copy of judgment dated 11.12.2012 Village Raipur Khurd 30.

Ex.P1 Site Plan 31.

Ex.P2 Copy of mutation dated 18.07.2007 of village Raipur Khurd 32.

Ex.P2/A Copy of Mutation dated 08.10.2012 33.

Ex.P2/B Copy of Mutation dated 08.10.2012 34.

Ex.P3 Copy of Award No. 522 dated 15.11.2011 35.

Ex.P4 Copy of judgment dated 11.12.2012 passed by the RC 36.

Ex.P5 Site Plan 2.3 On the other hand, the respondents have examined the following witnesses in oral evidence:- Sr. No.

Name of the Witness Particulars of the Witness Village Chilla 1.

RW.1 Jaspreet Singh Sandhu Horticulture Development Officer 2.

RW.2 Ashok Kumar -- 3.

RW.3 Rajiv Gupta -- Village Mauli Baidwan 4.

RW.1 Ashok Kumar -- 5.

RW.2 Balwinder Singh Forester Village Kumbra 6.

RW.1 Ashok Kumar Kanungo Village Raipur Khurd 7.

RW.1 Ashok Kumar Kanungo 2.4 In the documentary evidence, the respondents have produced the following documentary evidence:- Sr. No.

Exhibit Number Description of the document Village Chilla 1.

Ex.R1 to Ex.R10 Copy of Survey List of Sector 81, Village Chilla 2.

Ex.R11 Copy of Notification under Section 4 dated 23.01.2004 3.

Ex.R12 Copy of Award No. 496 dated 26.12.2006

Sr. No.

Exhibit Number Description of the document 4.

Ex.R13 Copy of Ledger 5.

Ex.R14 to Ex.C16 Copy of Calculation Village Mauli Baidwan 6.

Ex.R1 Copy of Award No. 1194 dated 26.12.2006 7.

Ex.R2 Copy of notification dated 03.01.2004 8.

Ex.RW.2/A Ex.PW.2/B Copy of the number and species of the Trees 9.

Ex.PW.2C Ex.PW.2D Copy of Assessment of Trees Village Kumbra 10.

Ex.R1 Copy of Statement No. 19 of Land Acquisition Act issued on 30.01.2008 11.

Ex.R2 Site Plan 12.

Ex.R3 Copy of Statement No. 19 of Land Acquisition Act issued on 12.05.2011 13.

Ex.R4 Copy of Statement No. 19 of Land Acquisition Act issued on 29.12.2008 14.

Ex.R5 Copy of Statement No. 19 of Land Acquisition Act issued on 29.12.2008 15.

Ex.R6 Copy of Statement No. 19 of Land Acquisition Act issued on 28.01.2009 16.

Ex.R7 Copy of Statement No. 19 of Land Acquisition Act issued on 30.12.2008 17.

Ex.R8 Copy of Statement No. 19 of Land Acquisition Act issued on 29.12.2008 18.

Ex.R9 Copy of Statement No. 19 of Land Acquisition Act issued on 29.12.2008 19.

Ex.R10 Copy of Statement No. 19 of Land Acquisition Act issued on 28.01.2009 20.

Ex.R11 Copy of Statement No. 19 of Land Acquisition Act issued on 21.01.2009 21.

Ex.R12 Copy of Statement No. 19 of Land Acquisition Act issued on 21.01.2009 22.

Ex.R13/Ex.R17 Copy of Statement No. 19 of Land Acquisition Act issued on 06.08.2009 23.

Ex.R14/Ex.R15 Copy of Statement No. 19 of Land Acquisition Act issued on 30.12.2008 24.

Ex.R16 Copy of Statement No. 19 of Land Acquisition Act issued on 22.01.2009 25.

Ex.R18 Copy of Notification dated 23.01.2004 26.

Ex.R19 Copy of Award No. 493 dated 26.12.2006

Sr. No.

Exhibit Number Description of the document Village Raipur Khurd 27.

Ex.R1 Copy of notification dated 23.01.2004 28.

Ex.R2 Copy of Award No. 495 dated 26.12.2006 29.

Ex.R3 Copy of Statement No. 19 of Land Acquisition Act issued on 02.03.2007 30.

Ex.R4/Ex./R5/ Ex.R6/Ex.R7 Copy of Statement No. 19 of Land Acquisition Act issued on 25.07.2006 31.

Ex.R8 Copy of Statement No. 19 of Land Acquisition Act 3.

Reasons recorded by the Reference Court 3.1 In batch No.1, the RC made the observations that all the exemplar sale deeds produced by the landowners are post the date of notification u/s 4 dated 23.01.2004. The sale deeds produced by the GMADA i.e. sale deeds No. 2839, 2873, 2122, 3021, 2039, 2157, 644, 1345, 1835, 849, 288, 2506 and 839 have been excluded from consideration on the ground that the price reflected in these sale deeds is lower than the amount awarded by the LAC. The RC has also declined to rely upon the LAC's awards announced on 15.11.2011 offering to pay @ ₹1,08,45,070/- per acre for the acquired land in villages Sohana, Lakhnaur, Behrampur, Manak Majra and Landran. Thereafter, the RC calculated the average price reflected in the sale deeds No. 2621 dated 23.11.2006, No. 2869 dated 19.12.2006, No. 2854 dated 18.12.

2006 and No. 2620 dated 23.11.2006 @ ₹1,07,88,368/-. The RC after noticing that the sale instances are post 23.01.2004, decided to roll back the price @ 12% per annum. After deducting 34% of ₹1,07,88,368/-, the RC arrived at the figure of ₹71,20,318/-. Thereafter, chose to apply 25% cut towards the development charges and assessed the market value of the acquired land in village Chilla @ ₹53,39,639/- per acre.

3.2 The RC assessed the market value of the land located in village Mauli Baidwan @ ₹71,40,000/- per acre. For the above noted reasons, the RC did not rely upon the LAC vide awards No.522, 523, 524, 525 and 526 offering to pay @ ₹1,08,45,070/- per acre to the landowners for acquisition of land located in villages Sohana, Lakhnaur, Behrampur, Manak Majra and Landran by different notifications. It was also noticed that all the sale deeds produced by the landowners are post 23.01.2004. The RC excluded three sale deeds produced by GMADA from consideration for assessing the market value on the ground that the aforesaid sale deeds reflect the price lower than ₹40,00,000/- per acre. Subsequently, the RC selected the post 23.01.2004 sale deed number 1985 dated 20.09.

2006 with respect to the land measuring 12 kanals 15 marlas sold @ ₹1,40,00,000/-. After applying deduction @ 32% i.e. @ 12% per annum @ ₹1,40,00,000/- it arrived at a figure of ₹95,00,000/-. Thereafter, towards development charges 25% cut was further applied to arrive at a figure of ₹71,40,000/-. 3.3 In the reference petitions arising from the acquisition of land in village Raipur Khurd, the RC vide judgment dated 16.04.2013 assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ₹53,39,634/- per acre. The RC took note of the fact that all the exemplar sale deeds produced by the landowners are post 23.01.2004, whereas the sale deeds produced by the beneficiary of acquisition reflect the price lower than ₹40,00,000/- per acre. Thereafter, the Court relied upon the award passed on 11.12.

2012 with respect to the acquisition of the land in village Chilla to assess the market value of the acquired land @ ₹53,39,639/- per acre.

3.4 With respect to the acquired land in village Kumbra, the RC,

vide award dated 26.03.2013 assessed the market value of acquired land @ ₹71,40,000/- per acre, at par with market value of the acquired land in village Mauli Baidwan. The sale deed No. 639, dated 24.05.2004 produced in evidence by GMADA with respect to the land measuring 8 kanalas 8 marlas located in village Kumbra was excluded from consideration on the ground that it reflects the price lower than the amount awarded by the LAC. 4.

Arguments put forth by the learned counsel representing the parties 4.1 Heard the learned counsel representing the parties, at length and with their able assistance, perused the paper-books along with the record of the RC.

4.2 Mr. Shailendra Jain, Senior Advocate, has filed a written synopsis wherein he has culled out his submission. The same is extracted as under:- "1.

The land in question is admittedly urban property, adjoins sector 67, 68, Phase XI, XII and main industrial area of SAS Nagar. Furthermore, it adjoins main bus stand, cricket stadium, and main GT Road running from Chandigarh to Sirhind and also the GT Road passing through Sectors 67, 68, 69, 70, 71 of SAS Nagar. The land in question is near to Chandigarh International Airport.

2.

Award No.522 (Ex.CX) (Sohana), Award No.523 (Lakhnaur), Award No.524 (Bairampur), Award No.525 (Manak Majra) and Award No.526 (Landran) dated

15.11.2011 for total area 888.49 Acres acquired for the public purpose of setting up of residential and urban estate in Sectors 88-89, are the most important pieces of evidence, wherein the Collector has awarded a sum of Rs.1,08,45,070/- per acre for notification u/s 4 dated 19.01.2004 and after adding statutory benefits, the total compensation per acre comes to Rs.1,63.38,915/-. 3.

As per the statement of Sh. Gurwinder Singh, Patwari RW1 in Reference No. 1 of 2010 (Rajender Kaur V/s State of Punjab), there is no difference in the quality and value of the lands of the two awards. Any other approach in payment of compensation in the case of present award No.496 would vis por tantamount in depriving a person/claimant of his property without authority of law and would be hit by the provisions of Article 300A of the Constitution of India. It is a settled law that lands of the villages adjoining each other are assessed at a uniform rate as held in State of Punjab V/s Harchal Singh: AIR 2006 Supreme Court 2122. All the villages' lands falls in contiguity under the same Master Plan of SAS Nagar Mohali and were required contemporaneously with a difference of three days in the dates of notifications. Parity in award of compensation was also the sole objective behind enactment of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act.

4.

Moreover, the same RC vide its Award, w.r.t. same date of acquisition, qua village Mauli Baidwan, awarded Rs.71,40,000/- per acre. It is well settled especially w.r.t. villages falling near Mohali that property is of same value and furthermore, once the LAC has awarded compensation to all villages at par, they are entitled to uniform rate on the basis of parity as well.

5.

With regards to the superstructures and trees, claimants have produced voluminous evidence and also got examined PW/5 Amar Singh, the Draftsman. The claimants pray for the indulgence of this court and make appropriate enhancement in the compensation.

6.

The evidence lead by the State of Punjab of the sale deeds executed prior to the date of notification u/s 4 are of lesser amount than the amount awarded by the Collector as compensation of Rs.40 Lakhs. Such transactions are undervalued as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in HSIDC V/s Pran Sukh & another (Law Finder ID 237476), Shubh Ram & Another V/s State of Haryana (Law Finder ID 459480). The statement of Ashok Kumar, Kanugo, O/o LAC, Department of Urban Development, Punjab (Ex.RW2) and statement of Gurvinder Singh, Patwari, RW1 in Reference No.1 of 2010 (Rajender Kaur V/s State of Punjab), where categorically stated that farmers always

get the sale deed registered at the lower price than the rate at which they purchase the land in order to save the stamp duty, can be cited for this purpose."

4.3 Mr. Naresh Kaushal, Advocate, has also submitted the following written submissions:- "i.

Firstly once the average of Ex.P-1 to P-6 has been taken and decrease on the amount work out is applied thereby reducing value to be from Rs. 1.40 Crore to Rs. 95,20,000/-, further cut of 25% was not warranted. ii.

Secondly as per the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Horrmal (deceased) through his LR and others Versus State of Haryana and others, SLP (C) No. 7963 of 2023 decided on 21.01.2024, land loosers are entitled to compensation on the basis of sale instance reflecting the higher value amongst various sale instances and that being so, sale instance in the case in hand EX P-6 relating to area measuring 26 Kanal 12 Marla of dated 11.07.2006 of village Daon sold for Rs. 19,30,25,000/-and per acre value comes to Rs. 5,80,52,631/- per acre. Further Ex. P5 reflect value to be Rs. 3,41,30,769/- per acre and Ex.P1 qua land of village Mauli Baidan measuring 30 Kanal 3 Marla sold for consideration of Rs. 5,84,15,625/- and per acre rate comes to Rs. 1.55 Crore.

iii.

Admittedly the bonafide of these sale instances Ex.P-1 to

P-6 has not been doubted and it is proved on record of the case that the same being bonafide reflect correct value and the Hon'ble Apex Court in the above said latest judgment has also held that post notification sales can only be considered when better evidence is not available on record.

iv.

As per the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court recently in the above said case as well as in earlier cases Section 23 mandates the market rate to be awarded as prevalent on the date of notification u/s 4, it never talks about the sale instances of prior thereto or post dated rather the same is interpretation by the Hon'ble Judicial Courts, all factors which includes, kind of land, potential of land, potentiality in future, surrounding all over development, price a willing buyer wants to pay and willing seller wants to get, are to be considered and further the post dated sale instances can be considered when better evidence is not available on record and the transactions are genuine and bonafide one."

4.4 The learned counsel representing the remaining respondents have adopted the above noted arguments.

4.5 Mr. Rupinder Khosla, Senior Advocate, representing the GMADA, drew the attention of the Court to LAC's award No. 522 announced on 15.11.2011, related to the acquired land located in village Sohana. He contended that the LAC has erred in assessing the market value

of the acquired land on the date of award i.e. 15.11.2011. He submitted that in all the batches, the RCs erred in calculating the average price of the various sale deeds which were executed post 23.01.2004 and thereafter, reduced the price @ 12% per annum while incorrectly excluding the sale deeds produced by the GMADA from consideration. 5.

Analysis and Discussion by this Court 5.1 The first submission made by Mr. Shailender Jain, Senior Advocate, is based upon the current situation of the acquired land. As per first part of Section 23(1) of the 1894 Act, the market value of the acquired land is required to be assessed on 23.01.2004. At the time of notification, neither the international airport was planned nor the area was developed. 5.2 It is important to note that the LAC while announcing the awards No. 522, 523, 524, 525 and 526 (villages Sohana, Khanaur, Behrampur, Manam Majra and Landran) has committed fundamental error in assessing the market value of the acquired land on the date of award, i.e. 15.11.2011 and not on the date of Section 4 notification (19.01.2004) as provided in the first part of Section 23(1).

A decision was taken by the Council of Ministers of Punjab Government in this respect in the peculiar facts of the case. Hence, these awards are in violation of the first part of Section 23(1) of the 1894 Act, which reads as under:- "23. Matters to be considered on determining compensation.

of the notification under section 4, sub-section (1)." 5.3 The awards which are against the mandate of the Statute would not serve as a good exemplar for assessing the market value of the acquired land as on 23.01.2004. Moreover, these awards are with respect to the acquisition of land by different notifications. The acquired land is also located in different villages.

5.4 It would be noticed here that the oral evidence of Patwari would not be sufficient to assess the market value of the acquired land. Similarly, the reliance placed on Section 28A of the 1894 Act to claim parity with the acquired land under different notification(s) is not made out because Section 28A provides another opportunity to the landowners who failed to apply under Section 18. Section 28A does not provide for parity of compensation under different notifications but only provides chance to the landowners who could not apply earlier. The judgment passed in The State of Punjab v. Harchal Singh (Dead) through LRs AIR 2006 Supreme Court 2122 is not applicable to the facts of the present case.

5.5 The next submission of the learned counsel is based upon the market value assessed of acquired land located in village Mauli Baidwan which shall be examined in the later part of the judgment. 5.6 With respect to the fifth submission, this Court is not deciding the cases involving the compensation for super structures and trees, hence, it does not need any discussion.

5.7 The sixth submission put forth by the learned counsel also lacks substance because the landowners have failed to lead cogent evidence to prove that the sale deeds produced by the GMADA were undervalued.

5.8 The first and second submissions of Mr. Naresh Kaushal, Advocate, shall be analyzed at a later stage. With regard to the third submission, it would be noticed that the sale instances No. 855 dated 12.06.2006, No. 856 dated 12.06.2006, No. 1985 dated 20.09.2006, No. 6665 dated 31.03.2006, No. 154 dated 10.04.2008 and 1240 dated 11.07.2006 produced in village Mauli Baidwan, are all post 23.01.2004 sale deeds. Hence, these can be relied upon only if there is no other sale deed of contemporaneous period to 23.01.2004. In this case, the GMADA has produced the sale deeds to prove the market value during the contemporaneous period.

5.9 With regard to the fourth submission, the market value of the acquired land is required to be assessed after taking a holistic view of the matter. In fact, the Supreme Court in Chimanlal Hargovinddass Vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer, Poona, (1988) 3 SCC 751 has laid down the following 17 tests for assessing the market value of the acquired land:- "4.

The following factors must be etched on the mental screen:

(1) A reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act is not an appeal against the award and the court cannot take into account the material relied upon by the Land Acquisition Officer in his award unless the same material is produced and proved before the court.

(2) So also the award of the Land Acquisition Officer is not to be treated as a judgment of the trial court open

or exposed to challenge before the court hearing the reference. It is merely an offer made by the Land Acquisition Officer and the material utilised by him for making his valuation cannot be utilised by the court unless produced and proved before it. It is not the function of the court to sit in appeal against the award, approve or disapprove its reasoning, or correct its error or affirm, modify or reverse the conclusion reached by the Land Acquisition Officer, as if it were an appellate court. (3) The court has to treat the reference as an original proceeding before it and determine the market value afresh on the basis of the material produced before it. (4) The claimant is in the position of a plaintiff who has to show that the price offered for his land in the award is inadequate on the basis of the materials produced in the court. Of course the materials placed and proved by the other side can also be taken into account for this purpose.

(5) The market value of land under acquisition has to be determined as on the crucial date of publication of the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (dates of notifications under Sections 6 and 9 are irrelevant).

(6) The determination has to be made standing on the date line of valuation (date of publication of notification

under Section 4) as if the valuer is a hypothetical purchaser willing to purchase land from the open market and is prepared to pay a reasonable price as on that day. It has also to be assumed that the vendor is willing to sell the land at a reasonable price.

(7) In doing so by the instances method, the court has to correlate the market value reflected in the most comparable instance which provides the index of market value.

(8) Only genuine instances have to be taken into account. (Sometimes instances are rigged up in anticipation of acquisition of land.) (9) Even post-notification instances can be taken into account (1) if they are very proximate, (2) genuine and

(3) the acquisition itself has not motivated the purchaser to pay a higher price on account of the resultant improvement in development prospects.

(10) The most comparable instances out of the genuine instances have to be identified on the following considerations:

(i) proximity from time angle, (ii) proximity from situation angle.

(11) Having identified the instances which provide the index of market value the price reflected therein may be taken as the norm and the market value of the land under

acquisition may be deduced by making suitable adjustments for the plus and minus factors vis-à-vis land under acquisition by placing the two in juxtaposition.

(12) A balance-sheet of plus and minus factors may be drawn for this purpose and the relevant factors may be evaluated in terms of price variation as a prudent purchaser would do.

(13) The market value of the land under acquisition has thereafter to be deduced by loading the price reflected in the instance taken as norm for plus factors and unloading it for minus factors.

(14) The exercise indicated in clauses (11) to (13) has to be undertaken in a common sense manner as a prudent man of the world of business would do. We may illustrate some such illustrative (not exhaustive) factors: Plus factors Minus factors smallness of size 1 largeness of area proximity to a road 2 situation in the interior at a distance from the road frontage on a road 3 narrow strip of land with very small frontage compared to depth nearness to developed area 4 lower level requiring the depressed portion to be filled up regular shape 5 remoteness from developed locality level vis-à-vis land under acquisition 6 some special disadvantageous factor which would deter a purchaser special value for an owner of an adjoining

property to whom it may have some very special advantage

(15) The evaluation of these factors of course depends on the facts of each case. There cannot be any hard and fast or rigid rule. Common sense is the best and most reliable guide. For instance, take the factor regarding the size. A building plot of land say 500 to 1000 sq. yds. cannot be compared with a large tract or block of land of say 10,000 sq. yds. or more. Firstly while a smaller plot is within the reach of many, a large block of land will have to be developed by preparing a lay out, carving out roads, leaving open space, plotting out smaller plots, waiting for purchasers (meanwhile the invested money will be blocked up) and the hazards of an entrepreneur.

The factor can be discounted by making a deduction by way of an allowance at an appropriate rate ranging approximately between 20 per cent to 50 per cent to account for land required to be set apart for carving out lands and plotting out small plots. The discounting will to some extent also depend on whether it is a rural area or urban area, whether building activity is picking up, and whether waiting period during which the capital of the entrepreneur would be locked up, will be longer or shorter and the attendant hazards.

(16) Every case must be dealt with on its own fact pattern bearing in mind all these factors as a prudent purchaser of land in which position the judge must place himself.

(17) These are general guidelines to be applied with understanding informed with common sense."

5.10 A perusal of the layout plan produced by the parties depicts that a compact block of land out of the aforesaid four villages was acquired. Hence, in the absence of evidence to prove that the price of the acquired land was different in all the villages (namely Mauli Baidwan, Raipur Khurd, Chilla and Kumbra), the RC erred in assessing the separate market value of those villages.

5.11 At this stage, the tabulated compilation of the sale deeds produced by all the parties is extracted as under:- Sr.

No.

Sale deed No.

and Date Sale Consideration (In ₹ ) Per Acre Price (In ₹ ) Area sold Location/Purpose Sale Deeds Produced by the Landowners 1.

5979/ 27.02.2006 3,65,52,082/- 1,21,08,350/- 24 Kanals 3 Marlas Patti Sohana/ Agricultural 2.

5966/ 27.02.2006 1,79,98,750/- 1,21,00,000/- 11 Kanals 18 Marlas Patti Sohana/Barani 3.

1985/ 20.09.2006 2,23,12,500/- 1,40,00,000/- 12 Kanals 15 Marlas Mauli Baidwan/ Chahi 4.

1515/ 07.08.2006 7,03,00,000/- 1,60,00,000/- 35 Kanals 3 Marlas Sukhgarh/Chahi 5.

3058/ 19.11.2008 2,17,81,250/- 1,70,00,000/- 10Kanals 5 Marlas Sukhgarh/Chahi 6.

2375/ 02.11.2006 4,29,00,000/- 1,60,00,000/- 21 Kanals 9 Marlas Dhurali/Chahi 7.

1645/ 05.08.2008 5,66,31,250/- 1,70,00,000/- 26 Kanals 13 Marlas Dhurali/Chahi 8.

1240/ 11.07.2006 19,30,25,000/- 5,80,52,631/- 26 Kanals 12 Marlas Bullo Majra/Chahi

Sr.

No.

Sale deed No.

and Date Sale Consideration (In ₹ ) Per Acre Price (In ₹ ) Area sold Location/Purpose 9.

6665/ 31.03.2006 8,82,61,875/- 1,53,00,000/- 46 Kanals 3 Marlas Dhol/Chahi 10.

1162/ 05.07.2007 56,66,640/- 1,35,99,936/- 2 Bighas 0 Biswas Raipur Khurd/ Chahi 11.

3369/ 15.12.2008 39,48,960/- 1,70,00,011/- 1 Bigha 2 Biswas 6 Biswansi Raipur Khurd/ Chahi 12.

2621/ 23.11.2006 8,34,26,558/- 1,06,99,999/- 37 Bighas 81⁄2 Biswas Chilla/Chahi 13.

2869/ 19.12.2006 7,81,32,288/- 1,06,99,999/- 35 Bighas 1 Biswa Chilla/Chahi 14.

2854/ 18.12.2006 3,57,78,124/- 1,06,99,999/- 16 Bighas 1 Biswas Chilla/Chahi 15.

2620/ 23.11.2006 2,01,73,957/- 1,06,99,999/- 9 Bighas 1 Biswas Chilla/Chahi 16.

154/ 10.04.2008 2,77,31,250/- 3,39,27,783/- 6 Kanals 10 Marlas 7 Sarsahi Bakarpur/Chahi 17.

3580/ 01.03.2007 3,33,59,375/- 2,50,00,000/- 10 Kanals 131⁄2 Marlas Bairampur/Chahi 18.

855/ 12.06.2006 5,84,15,625/- 1,55,00,000/- 30 Kanals 3 Marlas Mauli Baidwan/ Chahi 19.

856/ 12.06.2006 84,28,125/- 1,55,00,000/- 4 Kanals 7 Marlas Mauli Baidwan/ Chahi Sale Deed Produced by GMADA 1.

2839/ 27.02.2003 7,20,000/- 4,32,000/- 8 Bighas 0 Biswas Chilla/Abi 2.

2873/ 08.01.2004 5,49,000/- 4,32,000/- 6 Bighas 2 Biswas Chilla/Chahi 3.

2122/ 03.02.2003 1,00,000/- 4,00,000/- 1 Bigha 4 Biswas Chilla/Abi 4.

3021/ 20.01.2004 2,85,000/- 4,34,285/- 3 Bighas 3 Biswas Chilla/Chahi 5.

2039/ 20.10.2003 2,16,000/- 4,32,000/- 2 Bighas 8 Biswas Chilla/Chahi 6.

2157/ 05.02.2003 9,40,000/- 5,01,333/- 9 Bighas 0 Biswas Raipur Khurd/ Chahi 7.

644/ 05.06.2003 7,30,000/- 5,00,571/- 7 Bighas 0 Biswas Raipur Khurd/ Chahi 8.

1345/ 07.08.2003 5,25,000/- 5,04,000/- 5 Bighas 0 Biswas Raipur Khurd/ Chahi 9.

1835/ 19.09.2003 39,80,000/- 5,00,105/- 38 Bighas 4 Biswas Raipur Khurd/ Chahi 10.

849/ 01.08.2001 2,20,000/- 16,00,000/- 1 Kanal 2 Marlas Mauli Baidwan/ Gair Mumkin 11.

288/ 20.05.2022 2,95,000/- 3,93,333/- 6 Kanals 0 Marlas Mauli Baidwan/ Barani 12.

2506/ 11.03.2003 3,00,000/- 4,00,000/- 6 Kanals 0 Marlas Mauli Baidwan/ Barani

Sr.

No.

Sale deed No.

and Date Sale Consideration (In ₹ ) Per Acre Price (In ₹ ) Area sold Location/Purpose 13.

639/ 24.05.2004 8,30,000/- 7,90,476/- 8 Kanals 8 Marlas Kumbra/Chahi I.

Village Chilla 5.12 On perusal of the tabulated compilation of the sale exemplars produced by the landowners with respect to village Chilla, it is evident that the sale deeds are post 23.01.2004. The notification u/s 4 of the 1894 Act was issued on 23.01.2004 (Ex.R11). The learned counsel representing the GMADA has informed the Court that the area of 20 biswansis or 1 biswa is 50.41666 square yards, whereas 20 biswas or 1 bigha is 1008.3333 square yards. 96 biswas (4 bighas 16 biswas) is equivalent to 1 acre land measuring 4840 square yards. There is a layout plan produced by the GMADA marking the location of sale instances produced by it. It is evident that all the sale instances produced by GMADA, namely sale deed No. 2389 dated 27.02.2003, sale deed No. 2873 dated 08.01.2004, sale deed No. 2122 dated 03.02.2003, sale deed No. 3021 dated 20.01.2004 and sale deed No. 2039 dated 20.10.2003 are of various parcels of land which are a part of the acquired land. In other words, these sale deeds pertain to parcels of acquired land vide notification dated 23.01.2004.

5.13 The correctness of the arguments advanced by Mr. Rupinder Singh Khosla, Senior Advocate, representing the GMADA is not disputed by the learned counsel representing the landowners. The RC has erred in excluding the exemplar sale deeds No. 2389, 2873, 2122, 3021 and 2039 for consideration by incorrectly interpreting Section 25 of the 1894 Act. This

issue is not longer res integra in view of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in Lal Chand vs. Union of India (2009) 15 SCC 769. Section 25 does not prohibit the Court from taking into account the sale instances reflecting a price lower than the amount assessed by the LAC. It only prohibits that the Court will not award compensation less than the amount awarded by the LAC under Section 11 of the 1894 Act. The RC has also erred in relying upon the judgment in Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation v. Pran Sukh and Another (2010) 11 SCC 175 which does not lay down that the sale deeds reflecting lower price than the amount offered by the LAC should be excluded for consideration. 5.14 Similarly, the RC has erred in working out the amount of compensation by taking into account the average of sale deeds executed post 23.01.

2004 particularly when the sale exemplars produced by the GMADA with respect to the acquired land were available. The sale exemplars of the acquired land during contemporaneous period are the important pieces of evidence to assess the market value of the acquired land during the time period of acquisition. The landowners have failed to lead cogent evidence to prove these sale deeds were undervalued. The sale exemplar No. 2389 is executed between two private individuals. Prem Singh had sold the land measuring 8 bighas which is nearly 2 acres to Harish Jain and others. Sale deed No. 2873 has been executed by Bhag Singh and others in favour of Sanjeev Kumar Nagal, 'Hindu Undivided Family'. The sale instance No. 3021 has been executed by Ujaggar Singh in favour of Surinderjit Singh HUF and others.

The Court has overlooked the fact that there was no necessity to take average of the sale deeds No.

2854 and 2620 and then roll back/decrease @ 12% per annum particularly when the sale instances No. 2389, 2873, 2122, 3021 and 2039 of the acquired land were available.

II.

Village Mauli Baidwan 5.15 With respect to the acquired land in village Mauli Baidwan, it is evident that all the six sale deeds produced by the landowners were post 23.01.2004. Sale instance No. 2506 produced by GMADA is with respect to a parcel of land which is at a distance of merely 10 acres from the boundary of the acquired land. Ex.R4 sale deed No. 2881 dated 20.05.2002 produced by the GMADA is only at a distance of 11 acres from the acquired land. Ex.R3, sale deed No. 849 dated 01.08.2001 pertains to a parcel of land that is located near the residential area of village Mauli Baidwan but not far away from the acquired land. Similar mistake was committed by the RC while excluding the sale deeds No. 849, 288, 2506, produced by the GMADA from consideration by incorrectly interpreting Section 25 of the 1894 Act. 5.

16 On perusal of the sale exemplars No. 849, 288 and 2506, it clearly proves that the landowners failed to prove that the market value of the acquired land was more than ₹40,00,000/-. Per acre price of small plot sold vide sale deed No. 849 dated 01.08.2001 comes to ₹16,00,000/-. Even if the increase of 12% per annum for a period of 21⁄2 years is calculated, still the price will not be ₹40,00,000/-. With respect to agricultural land, the sale instances No. 288 and 2506 which reflect the price of approximately ₹4,00,000/- in the year from 2002-2003. Hence, the amount offered by the LAC did not require any interference.

III.

Village Kumbra 5.17 With respect to the cases arising from village Kumbra, it would be noticed that the landowners have produced five sale instances which are post 23.01.2004 period. The GMADA has produced the sale instance No. 639 dated 24.05.2004 which is also post 23.01.2004 sale instance but is related to the parcel of land measuring 8 kanals 8 marlas which abuts the acquired land. This particular parcel of land is located on the boundary of the acquired land. It clearly reflects that even after the Urban Estate was planned, the prices of the land did not shoot up. IV.

Village Raipur Khurd 5.18 With respect to the acquisition of the land in village Raipur Khurd, the landowners have produced sale instances No. 1162, 154, 6665 and 1240 all sale instances post 23.01.2004 period. The sale deed No. 1162 is the only sale instance of the parcel of land sold in village Raipur Khurd. The remaining sale instances No. 154, 6665 and 1240 are related to the land sold in different villages. On the other hand, the GMADA has produced the sale instances No. 2157, 644, 1345 and 1835 pertaining to the parcels of the land which have been acquired vide notification dated 23.01.2004. In other words, these sale instances are of different parcels of the land which have been acquired. The sale instance No. 2157 is with respect to the area more than two acres.

This is the sale deed executed by Garib Siingh in favour of Gurmeet Singh. The State had no role to play in the execution of the aforesaid sale deed. Similarly, a land measuring 7 bighas which is more than 11⁄2 acres was sold on 05.06.2003 in sale instance No. 644 by Ujaggar Singh in favour of Sant Baba Balwant Singh Ji Maharaj.

No. 1345 dated 07.08.2003 is a sale deed pertaining to the land measuring more than 1 acre executed by Kartar Singh in favour of Sher Singh. A perusal of the sale instance No. 1835 dated 19.09.2003 proves that approximately 9 acres of the land was sold for ₹39,80,000/-. The per acre price comes to nearly ₹5,00,000/- per acre. Hence, it was not appropriate for the RC to assess the market value on the basis of the market value of the acquired land of village Chilla.

5.19 Similarly, the RC has also erred in misreading the judgment passed by the High Court 2006 (2) PLJ 39 as well as by the Supreme Court in Pran Sukh's case (supra). These judgments do not lay down that the sale instances reflecting the price lower than the price offered by the LAC are not required to be taken into account. The RC has relied upon the judgment without properly reading the judgment. Moreover, in Lal Chand's case (supra), the Supreme Court has already clarified the law. 5.20 The RC has also overlooked the assessment of the market value of the acquired land vide notification dated 21.02.2000 of villages, namely Sohana, Mauli Baidwan, Raipur Khurd and Lakhnaur. The High Court (RFA No. 3004 of 2006 (Surjit Singh v. State of Punjab and Another) assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ₹19,85,700/- per acre.

The Supreme Court in Paramjit Panag and Another v. State of Punjab (Civil Appeal No. 331/2014) assessed the market value @ ₹21,85,700/- by making addition of ₹2,00,000/- per acre (₹23,85,700/- per acre). The acquired land vide notification dated 21.02.2000 abuts the acquired land vide notification dated 23.01.2004. The difference between the two notifications was only 11 months.

5.21 With regard to fourth submission of Mr. Jain, it would be noticed that this Court has held that the RC has erred in assessing the market value @ ₹71,40,000/- per acre. Hence, the submission lacks substance. 5.22 With respect to the first and second submission of Mr. Kaushal, it would be noticed that this Court has not assessed the market value on the basis of average price of sale exemplars No. 855 dated 12.06.2006, No. 856 dated 12.06.2006, No. 1985 dated 20.09.2006, No. 6665 dated 31.03.2006, No. 154 dated 10.04.2008 and 1240 dated 11.07.2006 produced in the matter related to village Mauli Baidwan. Hence, the question of applying of appropriate cut does not arise. The learned counsel has also relied upon the judgment passed in Horrmal (Deceased) through his LR and Others v. State of Haryana and Others 2024 SCCOnline SC 2990.

This Court has carefully read the judgment. The Supreme Court found that Ex.P5 sale instance is of similar nature to the acquired land. The aforesaid judgment was passed in peculiar facts of the case. In that case, Ex.P5 was not an exemplar sale instance of the period post notification u/s 4 whereas in these cases, all the sale instances No. 855, 856, 1985, 6665, 154 and 1240 are with respect to the period post 23.01.2004.

5.23 Mr. Kaushal, in Regular First Appeal No. 4608 of 2013, has filed an application for permission to lead additional evidence in order to produce the copies of two judgments passed by the RC on 13.03.2015 and 24.08.2013. Vide judgment dated 13.03.2015, the RC assessed the market value of the acquired land located in village Manak Majra vide notification u/s 4 issued on 19.04.2004 @ ₹2,30,10,000/- per acre. Similarly, with respect to the acquisition of land in village Kambala vide notification u/s 4

dated 30.09.2005, the RC has assessed the market value @ ₹1,31,22,535/- vide judgment dated 24.08.2013. Both these awards pertain to acquisition of land by separate notification with respect to the land located in different villages. The appeals against the RCs judgments are pending. Hence, it would not be appropriate to rely upon the same. 6.

Decision 6.1 Consequently, all the appeals filed by the GMADA are allowed, whereas that of the landowners shall stand dismissed. 6.2 The miscellaneous application(s) pending, if any, in all the appeals shall stand disposed of.

(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge February 25, 2025 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Sr. No.

Case No.

Party's Name 1.

RFA-1124-2013 Rajinder Kaur And Others Vs. State Of Punjab And Others 2.

RFA-1125-2013 Amrao Singh And Others Vs. State Of Punjab And Others 3.

RFA-1409-2013 Rajinder Kaur Vs. State Of Punjab 4.

RFA-1410-2013 Amrao Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 5.

RFA-1411-2013 Davinder Pal Singh Vs. Land Acquisition Collector & Others 6.

RFA-1412-2013 Amrao Singh & Others Vs. State Of Punjab 7.

RFA-1413-2013 Kaka Singh & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 8.

RFA-1414-2013 Ramanjeet Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 9.

RFA-1415-2013 Parvinder Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 10.

RFA-1416-2013 Harmit Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 11.

RFA-1417-2013 Manmohan Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 12.

RFA-1418-2013 Mohan Lal Saitia Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 13.

RFA-1419-2013 Gurdev Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 14.

RFA-1420-2013 Dharam Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Others 15.

RFA-1421-2013 Manpreet Singh Vs. Land Acquisition Collector & Another 16.

RFA-1422-2013 Mewa Singh & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Another

Sr. No.

Case No.

Party's Name 17.

RFA-1423-2013 Paramjit Kaur Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 18.

RFA-1988-2013 Sumit Kumar Vs. State Of Punjab And Others 19.

RFA-1989-2013 Anil Kaushik And Another Vs. State Of Punjab And Others 20.

RFA-2283-2013 Rajeev Nagpal And Others Vs. State Of Punjab And Another 21.

RFA-2284-2013 Harbans Kaur & Another Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 22.

RFA-2285-2013 Harpreet Singh Vs. State Of Punjab And Another 23.

RFA-2286-2013 Gian Chand And Others Vs. State Of Punjab And Another 24.

RFA-2288-2013 Rajinder Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 25.

RFA-2289-2013 Ajaib Singh And Others Vs. State Of Punjab 26.

RFA-2614-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Sushil Kumar Attri And Others 27.

RFA-2904-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Amarjit Singh And Others 28.

RFA-2905-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Nazar Singh And Another 29.

RFA-2906-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Adish Jain And Others 30.

RFA-2907-2013 with XOBJR-1-CI-2017 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Kuldip Singh And Others 31.

RFA-2908-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Darshan Singh And Others 32.

RFA-2909-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Parveen Bajwa And Another 33.

RFA-2910-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Pritam Singh And Others 34.

RFA-2911-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Mewa Singh And Others 35.

RFA-2912-2013 with XOBJR-98-CI-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Ajaib Singh And Others 36.

RFA-2914-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Harpreet Singh And Another 37.

RFA-2913-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Updesh Jaspal And Others 38.

RFA-2915-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Manpreet Singh And Another 39.

RFA-2916-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Paramjit Kaur And Another 40.

RFA-2917-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Surinderjit Singh And Another 41.

RFA-2918-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Surinderjit Singh And Another 42.

RFA-2919-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Surinderjit And Others 43.

RFA-2920-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Surinderjit Singh And Others 44.

RFA-2921-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Baldev

Sr. No.

Case No.

Party's Name Singh And Others 45.

RFA-2922-2013 with XOBJR-80-2023 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Devi Charan And Others 46.

RFA-2924-2013 with XOBJR-5-CI-2018 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Karnail Singh And Others 47.

RFA-2923-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Santokh Singh And Others 48.

RFA-2925-2013 with XOBJR-8-2023 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Labh Singh And Others 49.

RFA-2926-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Parvinder Singh 50.

RFA-2927-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Sohan Singh And Another 51.

RFA-2928-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Amarjit Singh And Another 52.

RFA-2929-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Dharam Singh And Another 53.

RFA-2930-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Vijay Kumar Jain And Another 54.

RFA-2931-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Balbir Kaur 55.

RFA-2932-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Harchand Singh And Another 56.

RFA-2933-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Ramanjeet Singh And Another 57.

RFA-2934-2013 & XOBJR-79-CI-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Surinderjit Singh 58.

RFA-2937-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Dara Singh And Others 59.

RFA-2936-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Sucha Singh And Another 60.

RFA-2938-2013 & XOBJR-77-CI-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Gurdeep Singh And Others 61.

RFA-2940-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Amrao Singh And Others 62.

RFA-2939-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Jai Narain And Others 63.

RFA-2941-2013 with XOBJR-70-CI-2018 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Devinder Singh And Another 64.

RFA-2942-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Harmit Singh And Another 65.

RFA-2943-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Amra Singh And Another 66.

RFA-2944-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Sher Singh And Others 67.

RFA-2945-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Rajeev Nagpal And Others 68.

RFA-2946-2013 with XOBJR-10-2024 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Palwinder Singh And Others 69.

RFA-3222-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Amarjit

Sr. No.

Case No.

Party's Name Singh And Another 70.

RFA-3223-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Gurdev Singh And Another 71.

RFA-3224-2013 with XOBJR-5-2023 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Gurcharan Singh And Others 72.

RFA-3231-2013 with XOBJR-51-2024 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Kultar Singh And Others 73.

RFA-3226-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Rajinder Nath And Others 74.

RFA-3232-2013 with XOBJR-80-CI-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Jyoti Jain And Another 75.

RFA-3227-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Poonam Deep Kaur And Others 76.

RFA-3228-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Lalit Jain And Another 77.

RFA-3233-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Poonam Deep Kaur And Others.

78.

RFA-3229-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Poonam Deep Kaur And Others 79.

RFA-3234-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Rajinder Singh And Others.

80.

RFA-3230-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Amrao Singh And Another 81.

RFA-3235-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Harbans Kaur And Others 82.

RFA-3236-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Bhajan Singh And Others 83.

RFA-3237-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Malkiat Singh And Others 84.

RFA-3770-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Mohinder Kaur And Others 85.

RFA-3774-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Surinder Kumar And Others 86.

RFA-3777-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Kulwinder Singh & Others 87.

RFA-3779-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Gurdev Singh And Another 88.

RFA-3781-2013 & XOBJR-76-CI-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Gurdeep Singh & Others 89.

RFA-3990-2013 Santokh Singh & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 90.

RFA-3991-2013 Poonam Deep Kaur & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Others 91.

RFA-3992-2013 Kulwinder Singh & Another Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 92.

RFA-3993-2013 Amra Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 93.

RFA-3994-2013 Amarjit Singh Bajwa Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 94.

RFA-3995-2013 Lalit Jain & Another Vs. State Of Punjab & Others 95.

RFA-4038-2013 Surinder Kumar Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 96.

RFA-4039-2013 Surinderjit Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Others

Sr. No.

Case No.

Party's Name 97.

RFA-4042-2013 Gurdev Singh Vs. State Of Punjab 98.

RFA-4043-2013 Bhajan Singh & Others Vs. State Of Punjab 99.

RFA-4044-2013 Amarjit Singh Vs. State Of Punjab And Another 100.

RFA-4045-2013 Mohinder Kaur & Another Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 101.

RFA-4046-2013 Ujagar Singh Vs. State Of Punjab 102.

RFA-4047-2013 Harchand Singh Vs. State Of Punjab And Another 103.

RFA-4048-2013 Mohinder Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 104.

RFA-4049-2013 Balbir Kaur Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 105.

RFA-4050-2013 Poonam Deep Kaur & Another Vs. State Of Punjab & Others 106.

RFA-4051-2013 Kultar Singh @ Avtar Singh & Another Vs. State Of Punjab & Others 107.

RFA-4052-2013 Poonam Deep Kaur & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Others 108.

RFA-4053-2013 Baldev Singh & Another Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 109.

RFA-4054-2013 Sher Singh & Another Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 110.

RFA-4055-2013 Gurdev Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 111.

RFA-4056-2013 Surinderjit Singh & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Others 112.

RFA-4057-2013 Surinderjit Singh & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Others 113.

RFA-4058-2013 Amarjit Singh & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 114.

RFA-4059-2013 Pal Singh & Another Vs. State Of Punjab 115.

RFA-4264-2013 Darshan Singh & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 116.

RFA-4265-2013 Rulda Singh & Others Vs. State Of Punjab 117.

RFA-4266-2013 Surinderjit Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Others 118.

RFA-4452-2013 Rachan Singh And Others Vs. State Of Punjab And Another 119.

RFA-4491-2013 Karnail Singh And Others Vs. State Of Punjab And Another 120.

RFA-4628-2013 Kanwar Singh Vs. State Of Punjab 121.

RFA-4629-2013 Parveen Bajwa Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 122.

RFA-4630-2013 Lalit Jain & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Others 123.

RFA-4631-2013 Baldev Singh & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 124.

RFA-4632-2013 Nazar Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 125.

RFA-4633-2013 Pawan Kumar Vs. State Of Punjab 126.

RFA-4634-2013 Savitri Devi & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 127.

RFA-4635-2013 Updesh Jaspal & Another Vs. State Of Punjab & Others 128.

RFA-4646-2013 Rajinder Nath & Another Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 129.

RFA-4664-2013 & XOBJR-78-CI-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Poonam Deep Kaur And Others 130.

RFA-4727-2013 Amrik Singh And Another Vs. State Of Punjab And Another 131.

RFA-4985-2013 Pawan Kumar Vs. State Of Punjab 132.

RFA-1126-2013 Bhagat Singh Vs. State Of Punjab 133.

RFA-1424-2013 Kamaljit Singh Vs. State Of Punjab

Sr. No.

Case No.

Party's Name 134.

RFA-1425-2013 Ajit Singh & Others Vs. State Of Punjab 135.

RFA-1426-2013 Balbir Singh & Others Vs. State Of Punjab 136.

RFA-2465-2013 Bakhtaur Singh Vs. State Of Punjab 137.

RFA-2466-2013 Karnail Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 138.

RFA-2615-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Jaspal Singh And Others 139.

RFA-2899-2013 Paramjit Singh Vs. State Of Punjab 140.

RFA-3144-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Pankaj Sood And Others 141.

RFA-3145-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Gurnam Singh And Another 142.

RFA-3146-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Raghbir Singh And Another 143.

RFA-3147-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Ajit Singh And Others 144.

RFA-3148-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Labh Kaur And Another 145.

RFA-3149-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Bakhtaur Singh And Another 146.

RFA-3150-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Harmail Singh And Others.

147.

RFA-3151-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Raghbir Singh And Another 148.

RFA-3152-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Pawan Kumar And Another 149.

RFA-3153-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Bahadur Singh And Another 150.

RFA-3154-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Kesar Singh And Another 151.

RFA-3155-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Piara Singh And Another 152.

RFA-3156-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Baldev Singh And Another 153.

RFA-4027-2013 Pawan Kumar Vs. State Of Punjab 154.

RFA-4028-2013 Gursharan Kaur Vs. State Of Punjab 155.

RFA-4293-2013 Mewa Singh Vs. State Of Punjab 156.

RFA-4295-2013 Surinder Rani & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 157.

RFA-4608-2013 Jaspal Singh & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 158.

RFA-4610-2013 Baldev Singh Vs. State Of Punjab 159.

RFA-4611-2013 Kesar Singh & Another Vs. State Of Punjab 160.

RFA-4612-2013 Dharminder Kumar & Others Vs. State Of Punjab 161.

RFA-4613-2013 Pankaj Sood & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 162.

RFA-4614-2013 Harmail Singh & Others Vs. State Of Punjab 163.

RFA-4615-2013 Raj Bala @ Raj Kumari Vs. State Of Punjab 164.

RFA-4616-2013 Raghbir Singh Vs. State Of Punjab 165.

RFA-4617-2013 Harchand Singh & Others Vs. State Of Punjab 166.

RFA-4618-2013 Labh Kaur Vs. State Of Punjab

Sr. No.

Case No.

Party's Name 167.

RFA-4619-2013 Jaspal Kaur & Others Vs. State Of Punjab 168.

RFA-4620-2013 Raghbir Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 169.

RFA-4621-2013 Piara Singh Vs. State Of Punjab 170.

RFA-4622-2013 Ram Singh & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 171.

RFA-4623-2013 Harpal Singh & Another Vs. State Of Punjab 172.

RFA-4624-2013 Harjinder Singh (Deceased) through his LRs Vs. State Of Punjab 173.

RFA-4625-2013 Labh Singh & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 174.

RFA-4626-2013 Bhagat Singh Vs. State Of Punjab 175.

RFA-4627-2013 Jarnail Singh & Another Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 176.

RFA-4824-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Parvinder Kaur And Others.

177.

RFA-4825-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Gursharan Kaur And Another 178.

RFA-4827-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Dial Singh And Others.

179.

RFA-4828-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Bhagat Singh & Another 180.

RFA-4829-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Mewa Singh & Another 181.

RFA-4984-2013 Jagir Kaur And Others Vs. State Of Punjab 182.

RFA-5486-2013 Parkashwati And Others Vs. State Of Punjab 183.

RFA-5631-2013 & XOBJR-56-CI-2015 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Gurdev Kaur And Another 184.

RFA-5632-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Baldev Singh & Others 185.

RFA-5633-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Jarnail Singh & Others 186.

RFA-5634-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Labh Singh & Others 187.

RFA-5635-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Surinder Rani & Others 188.

RFA-5636-2013 with XOBJR-52-2024 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Baldev Kaur & Others 189.

RFA-5637-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Bakhatur Singh And Others 190.

RFA-5638-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Karnail Singh And Another 191.

RFA-5639-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Parkashwati & Others 192.

RFA-5640-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Angrez Kaur & Others 193.

RFA-5641-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Raghbir Singh & Others.

194.

RFA-5643-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Naib Singh And Others.

195.

RFA-5644-2013 & XOBJR-57-CI-2015 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Mohan Singh And Another

Sr. No.

Case No.

Party's Name 196.

RFA-5645-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Kamaljit Singh And Another 197.

RFA-5646-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Sukhdev Singh & Others 198.

RFA-5647-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Harbhajan Singh & Others 199.

RFA-5648-2013 with XOBJR-23-2019 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Bant Singh & Others 200.

RFA-5649-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Paramjit Kaur And Another 201.

RFA-5650-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Dharminder Kumar & Others 202.

RFA-5651-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Raj Bala And Another 203.

RFA-5652-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Bhagat Singh And Another 204.

RFA-5653-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Harjinder Singh And Another 205.

RFA-5654-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Balbir Singh & Others 206.

RFA-5655-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Paramjit Singh And Another 207.

RFA-5656-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Himmat Singh & Others 208.

RFA-5657-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Jaspal Kaur & Others 209.

RFA-5658-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Harpal Singh & Another 210.

RFA-5676-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Harbhajan Singh & Others 211.

RFA-2061-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Jaspal Singh And Others 212.

RFA-2062-2014 State Of Punjab And Another Vs. Sushil Kumar Attri 213.

RFA-4418-2013 Khushbagh Singh And Others Vs. State Of Punjab And Another 214.

RFA-1211-2013 Amarjit Singh And Others Vs. State Of Punjab And Others 215.

RFA-1672-2013 Sumit Kumar Vs. State Of Punjab And Others 216.

RFA-1427-2013 Gurmail Singh Vs. State Of Punjab 217.

RFA-2281-2013 Sushil Kumar Attri Vs. State Of Punjab And Others 218.

RFA-2282-2013 Amarjit Singh And Another Vs. State Of Punjab And Others 219.

RFA-2287-2013 Himat Singh And Others Vs. State Of Punjab And Others 220.

RFA-2290-2013 Sushil Kumar Attri Vs. State Of Punjab And Others 221.

RFA-2376-2013 Rajeev Nagpal And Another Vs. State Of Punjab And Others 222.

RFA-2378-2013 Anil Kaushik And Another Vs. State Of Punjab And Another 223.

RFA-2592-2013 Jagjit Singh Vs. State Of Punjab

Sr. No.

Case No.

Party's Name 224.

RFA-2823-2013 Adish Jain And Another Vs. State Of Punjab And Others 225.

RFA-2935-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Manmohan Singh And Another 226.

RFA-3376-2013 Vijay Kumar & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 227.

RFA-3771-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Rachan Singh & Others 228.

RFA-3772-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Amrik Singh And Others 229.

RFA-3773-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Savitri Devi & Others 230.

RFA-3775-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Sumit Kumar And Another 231.

RFA-3776-2013 with XOBJR-124-2021 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Karnail Singh And Another 232.

RFA-3778-2013 with XOBJR-49-CI-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Gurvir Kaur Gill And Others 233.

RFA-3780-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Kaka Singh And Others 234.

RFA-3782-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Davinder Pal Singh And Others 235.

RFA-3783-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Baldev Singh & Others 236.

RFA-4609-2013 Amar Singh & Another Vs. State Of Punjab & Others 237.

RFA-4663-2013 with XOBJR-17-CI-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Nasib Singh And Others 238.

RFA-4826-2013.

Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Amarjit Singh And Another 239.

RFA-4830-2013 with XOBJR-135-CI-2015 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Harjit Singh And Others.

240.

RFA-5487-2013 Sukhdev Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Others 241.

RFA-6127-2013 Gian Singh & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 242.

RFA-6128-2013 Sadhu Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 243.

RFA-6129-2013 Mewa Singh & Another Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 244.

RFA-6130-2013 Gurdial Singh & Another Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 245.

RFA-6131-2013 Palo Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 246.

RFA-6132-2013 Jasbir Singh And Another Vs. State Of Punjab And Another 247.

RFA-6134-2013 Gurwinder Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 248.

RFA-6133-2013 Jasbir Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 249.

RFA-6695-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Gurdev Singh & Another 250.

RFA-6696-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Ujagar Sigh & Another 251.

RFA-6697-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Bhag Singh And Another 252.

RFA-6698-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Ram Pal And Another 253.

RFA-6699-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Amrik

Sr. No.

Case No.

Party's Name Singh And Others 254.

RFA-6700-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Pawan Kumar & Another 255.

RFA-6701-2013 with XOBJR-18-2023 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Amrik Singh & Others 256.

RFA-6702-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Gian Chand And Another 257.

RFA-6703-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Narajan Singh & Others 258.

RFA-6704-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Ajaib Singh & Others 259.

RFA-6705-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Pal Singh And Others 260.

RFA-6706-2013 with XOBJR-8-CI-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Manjit Singh & Another 261.

RFA-6707-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Mohinder Singh And Others 262.

RFA-6708-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Bhajan Singh And Others 263.

RFA-6709-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Amarjit Singh And Another 264.

RFA-6710-2013 with XOBJR-17-2023 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Baljit Singh And Others 265.

RFA-6711-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Rajinder Kaur And Others 266.

RFA-6712-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Swaran Singh & Others 267.

RFA-6713-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Kanwar Singh And Another 268.

RFA-6714-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Amrao Singh And Others 269.

RFA-6715-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Jagjit Singh & Another 270.

RFA-6716-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Mohan Lal Saitia And Another 271.

RFA-6717-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Gurmail Singh And Another 272.

RFA-6718-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Vijay Kumar & Others 273.

RFA-50-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Sumit Kumar And Others 274.

RFA-51-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Amarjit Singh And Others 275.

RFA-202-2014 Bachan Singh And Others. Vs. State Of Punjab And Others.

276.

RFA-203-2014 Sucha Singh & Another Vs. State Of Punjab & Others 277.

RFA-821-2014 Rashbhinder Singh And Another Vs. State Of Punjab And Others 278.

RFA-1442-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Narmail Singh & Others

Sr. No.

Case No.

Party's Name 279.

RFA-1443-2014 with XOBJR-309-CI-2016 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Gurmail Singh And Another 280.

RFA-1444-2014 with XOBJR-308-CI-2016 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Gurmail Singh & Others 281.

RFA-1445-2014 with XOBJR-311-CI-2016 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Gurmit Singh & Others 282.

RFA-1446-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Gian Singh & Others 283.

RFA-1447-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Jasbir Singh & Others 284.

RFA-1448-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Mewa Singh & Others 285.

RFA-1449-2014 with XOBJR-162-CI-2015 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Sohan Singh & Others 286.

RFA-1450-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Joginder Kaur & Another 287.

RFA-1451-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Gurwinder Singh 288.

RFA-1452-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Gurdial Singh & Another 289.

RFA-1453-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Palo And Another 290.

RFA-1454-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Jasbir Singh And Another 291.

RFA-1455-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Sucha Singh & Others.

292.

RFA-1456-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Gurmukh Singh & Others 293.

RFA-1457-2014 with XOBJR-251-CI-2016 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Kuldip Singh & Others 294.

RFA-1458-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Sadhu Singh And Another 295.

RFA-1459-2014 with XOBJR-9-CI-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Ajit Singh & Others 296.

RFA-1484-2014 with XOBJR-348-CI-2016 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Surinderpal Singh & Others.

297.

RFA-1460-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Rashbhinder Singh & Others.

298.

RFA-3492-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Amrao Singh And Another 299.

RFA-3491-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Poonam Deep Kaur & Another 300.

RFA-1011-2016 with XOBJR-246-CI-2016 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Raj Kumari And Another 301.

RFA-1800-2017 with XOBJR-13-CI-2018 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Avtar Singh And Another 302.

RFA-3493-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Labh Singh & Others 303.

RFA-3005-2016 with XOBJR-2-CI-2017 with XOBJR-326-CIGreater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Bhag Singh And Others 304.

RFA-3494-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Ajaib Singh & Others

Sr. No.

Case No.

Party's Name 305.

RFA-3496-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Devi Charan & Others 306.

RFA-3495-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Updesh Jaspal & Others 307.

RFA-3497-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Lalit Jain And Another 308.

RFA-3498-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Ramanjeet Singh 309.

RFA-3499-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Santokh Singh & Others 310.

RFA-3500-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Dara Singh & Others 311.

RFA-3501-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Palwinder Singh & Others 312.

RFA-3502-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Paramjit Kaur 313.

RFA-3503-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Manmohan Singh 314.

RFA-3504-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Gurcharan Singh & Others 315.

RFA-3506-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Harchand Singh 316.

RFA-3505-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Rajinder Nath & Another 317.

RFA-3507-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Pritam Singh & Others 318.

RFA-3510-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Mewa Singh & Others 319.

RFA-3508-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Harpreet Singh 320.

RFA-3509-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Poonam Deep Kaur & Another 321.

RFA-3511-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Amra Singh 322.

RFA-3512-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Surinderjit Singh And Others 323.

RFA-3513-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Baldev Singh & Others 324.

RFA-3514-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Gurdeep Singh & Others 325.

RFA-3515-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Sucha Singh And Another 326.

RFA-3516-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Poonam Deep Kaur & Others 327.

RFA-3517-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Devinder Singh 328.

RFA-3518-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Surinderjit Singh & Others 329.

RFA-3519-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Harmit Singh 330.

RFA-3520-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Nazar Singh 331.

RFA-3521-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Parvinder Singh And Another 332.

RFA-3522-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Surinderjit Singh & Another 333.

RFA-3523-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Sher Singh & Others 334.

RFA-3525-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Kuldip Singh & Others 335.

RFA-3524-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Amarjit Singh & Others 336.

RFA-3526-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Malkiat Singh & Others 337.

RFA-3527-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Sohan Singh Andanother 338.

RFA-3528-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Amarjit Singh And Another 339.

RFA-3529-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Karnail Singh & Others 340.

RFA-3530-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Parveen Bajwa And Another 341.

RFA-3531-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Kultar Singh & Others 342.

RFA-3532-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Gurdev Singh And Another 343.

RFA-3533-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Bhajan Singh & Others 344.

RFA-3534-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Balbir Kaur And Another 345.

RFA-3535-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Hardip Kaur Gill And Another 346.

RFA-3536-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Surinderjit Singh & Others

Sr. No.

Case No.

Party's Name 347.

RFA-3537-2014 Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Estate Mohali Vs. Manpreet Singh And Another 348.

RFA-3538-2014 State Of Punjab And Another Vs. Surinderjit Singh & Another 349.

RFA-3539-2014 State Of Punjab And Another Vs. Jyoti Jain & Others 350.

RFA-3540-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Lalit Jain & Others 351.

RFA-3541-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Sumit Kumar And Another 352.

RFA-3542-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Amrik Singh & Others 353.

RFA-3543-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Pal Singh & Another 354.

RFA-3544-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Karnail Singh And Another 355.

RFA-3545-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Ujjager Singh 356.

RFA-3563-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Kulwinder Singh & Others 357.

RFA-3546-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Jagjit Singh 358.

RFA-3562-2014 State Of Punjab And Another Vs. Harbans Kaur And Others 359.

RFA-3564-2014 State Of Punjab And Another Vs. Vijay Kumar And Another 360.

RFA-3547-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Amrik Singh & Others 361.

RFA-3565-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Darshan Singh & Others 362.

RFA-3548-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Bhajan Singh And Others 363.

RFA-3549-2014 State Of Punjab And Another Vs. Poonam Deep Kaur And Others 364.

RFA-3550-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Baldev Singh & Others 365.

RFA-3566-2014 State Of Punjab And Another Vs. Jai Narain & Others 366.

RFA-3567-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Rachan Singh And Others 367.

RFA-3551-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Bhag Singh 368.

RFA-3568-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Gurdeep Singh And Others 369.

RFA-3570-2014 State Of Punjab And Another Vs. Adish Jain And Others 370.

RFA-3552-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Amarjit Singh 371.

RFA-3569-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Swaran Singh 372.

RFA-3571-2014 State Of Punjab And Another Vs. Dharam Singh And Another 373.

RFA-3553-2014 State Of Punjab And Another Vs. Mohinder Singh 374.

RFA-3572-2014 State Of Punjab And Another Vs. Rajeev Nagpal And Others 375.

RFA-3575-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Savitri Devi And Others 376.

RFA-3554-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Nasib Singh And Others 377.

RFA-3555-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Ajaib Singh & Others 378.

RFA-3573-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Surinder Kumar And Another 379.

RFA-3574-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Manjit Singh 380.

RFA-3556-2014 State Of Punjab And Another Vs. Amrao Singh And Others 381.

RFA-3576-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Gurvir Kaur Gill And Another 382.

RFA-3557-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Naranjan Singh & Others 383.

RFA-3577-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Kanwar Singh

Sr. No.

Case No.

Party's Name 384.

RFA-3558-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Ram Pal 385.

RFA-3578-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Amarjit Singh & Others 386.

RFA-3560-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Mohinder Kaur And Others 387.

RFA-3559-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Kaka Singh & Others 388.

RFA-3579-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Devinder Pal Singh And Another 389.

RFA-3580-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Vijay Kumar And Others 390.

RFA-3561-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Gurdev Singh & Others 391.

RFA-3582-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Amrik Singh And Others 392.

RFA-3581-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Gian Chand And Others 393.

RFA-3583-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Amrao Singh 394.

RFA-3584-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Mohan Lal Saitia 395.

RFA-3585-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Rajinder Singh 396.

RFA-3586-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Gurdev Singh 397.

RFA-3587-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Gurmail Singh 398.

RFA-3588-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Pawan Kumar 399.

RFA-3589-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Baljit Singh And Others 400.

RFA-3590-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Rajinder Kaur 401.

RFA-4230-2014 Vijay Kumar And Others Vs. State Of Punjab And Another 402.

RFA-7263-2014 Vijay Kumar Jain Vs. State Of Punjab And Others 403.

RFA-9436-2014 with XOBJR-24-CI-2018 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Baljinder Singh & Others 404.

RFA-9437-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Bachan Singh & Others 405.

RFA-9439-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Mohinder Singh & Others 406.

RFA-9440-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Mohinder Singh & Others 407.

RFA-4294-2013 Angrez Kaur & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 408.

RFA-2126-2014 Gurdev Kaur & Another Vs. State Of Punjab & Others 409.

RFA-4266-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Khushbagh Singh & Others 410.

RFA-9760-2014 Ramanjit Singh & Another Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 411.

RFA-9825-2014 Naib Singh Vs. Punjab State And Another 412.

RFA-10343-2014 Mohinder Singh And Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Others 413.

RFA-418-2015 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Gurdev Kaur & Another 414.

RFA-1903-2015 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Lal Singh And Others 415.

RFA-2258-2014 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority & Others Vs. Kishan Dev @ Krishan Dev & Others 416.

RFA-2259-2014 with XOBJR-35-CI-2017 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority & Others Vs. Gurmail Singh & Another 417.

RFA-2260-2014 & Greater Mohali Area Development Authority & Others

Sr. No.

Case No.

Party's Name XOBJR-14-CI-2014 Vs. Devi Dayal & Another 418.

RFA-2261-2014 & XOBJR-23-CI-2014 Greater Mohali Area Dev Authority (Gmada) Vs. Daljinder Singh & Others 419.

RFA-2262-2014 & XOBJR-55-CI-2015 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Karnail Singh & Another 420.

RFA-2434-2014 with XOBJR-325-CI-2016 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority & Others Vs. Gurmail Singh & Others 421.

RFA-1707-2015 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (Gmada) Vs. Surinder Rani And Others 422.

RFA-2342-2015 Surinder Rani And Others Vs. State Of Punjab And Another 423.

RFA-3891-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Amarjit Singh 424.

RFA-3892-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Raghbir Singh & Another 425.

RFA-3893-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Mewa Singh 426.

RFA-3894-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Jarnail Singh 427.

RFA-3895-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Parvinder Kaur 428.

RFA-3896-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Ajit Singh & Others 429.

RFA-3897-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Bakhatur Singh 430.

RFA-3898-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Harbhajan Singh & Others 431.

RFA-3899-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Harchand Singh 432.

RFA-3900-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Angrez Kaur 433.

RFA-3901-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Paramjit Singh 434.

RFA-3902-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Gursharan Kaur 435.

RFA-3903-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Dial Singh And Others 436.

RFA-3904-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Harjit Singh & Others 437.

RFA-3905-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Harmail Singh And Others 438.

RFA-3906-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Gurnam Singh 439.

RFA-3907-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Baldev Singh 440.

RFA-3909-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Balbir Singh And Others 441.

RFA-3908-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Dharminder Kumar & Others 442.

RFA-3910-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Baldev Kaur And Others 443.

RFA-3911-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Kesar Singh And Another 444.

RFA-3912-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Parkashwati And Others 445.

RFA-3913-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Harjinder Singh 446.

RFA-3914-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Himmat Singh And Others 447.

RFA-3915-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Labh Kaur 448.

RFA-3916-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Sukhdev Singh And Others 449.

RFA-3917-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Naib Singh 450.

RFA-3918-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Raghbir Singh 451.

RFA-3919-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Bant Singh And Others 452.

RFA-3920-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Pankaj Sood And Others 453.

RFA-3921-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Gurdev Kaur 454.

RFA-3922-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Paramjit Kaur 455.

RFA-3923-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Jaspal Kaur & Others

Sr. No.

Case No.

Party's Name 456.

RFA-3924-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Labh Singh And Others 457.

RFA-3925-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Bahadur Singh 458.

RFA-3926-2014 with XOBJR-36-2022 State Of Punjab Vs. Baldev Singh & Others 459.

RFA-3927-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Bakhtaur Singh 460.

RFA-3928-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Surinder Rani & Others 461.

RFA-3929-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Harbhajan Singh And Others 462.

RFA-3930-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Piara Singh 463.

RFA-3931-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Pawan Kumar 464.

RFA-3932-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Bhagat Singh 465.

RFA-3933-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Mohan Singh 466.

RFA-3934-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Raj Bala Alias Raj Kumari 467.

RFA-3935-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Raghbir Singh 468.

RFA-3936-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Harpal Singh & Another 469.

RFA-3937-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Bhagat Singh 470.

RFA-3938-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Kamaljit Singh 471.

RFA-3939-2014 State Of Punjab Vs. Karnail Singh 472.

RFA-994-2015 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Rajeev Nagpal & Another 473.

RFA-995-2015 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Vijay Kumar & Others 474.

RFA-996-2015 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Jai Narain & Others.

475.

RFA-2130-2015 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Sushil Kumar Attri And Others 476.

RFA-2131-2015 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Ramanjit Singh And Others 477.

RFA-5414-2015 Sukhdeep Singh And Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Others 478.

RFA-4213-2016 Sucha Singh Vs. State Of Punjab And Another 479.

RFA-4261-2016 Pritam Singh Since Deceased Through LRs & Others Vs. State Of Punjab & Another 480.

RFA-1410-2017 Parvinder Kaur Vs. State Of Punjab 481.

RFA-2129-2015 with XOBJR-148-CI-2015 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Bhagat Singh And Others s 482.

RFA-3680-2018 Rajinder Nath Vs. State Of Punjab And Another 483.

RFA-5642-2013 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Harchand Singh & Others (Anil Kshetarpal) Judge February 25, 2025 "DK"