High Court of Punjab and HaryanaFAO-M/41/2016dismissed

Gagan Kumar v. Mamta Rani

2016-04-22Bench- 4,Mr. Justice Sudhir Mittal1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH FAO-M-41 of 2016 DATE OF DECISION :- April 22, 2016 Gagan Kumar ...Appellant

Versus

Mamta Rani

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH Present:- Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the respondent. *** M.JEYAPAUL, J.

It is submitted by the counsel appearing for the appellant that the matter has been compromised between the parties and, therefore, the appeal itself may be dismissed as withdrawn. In view of the above, we are of the considered view that the question of payment of any litigation expenses by the appellant does not arise. In the light of the submission made by the appellant, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(M. JEYAPAUL) JUDGE (RAJ MOHAN SINGH) JUDGE April 22, 2016 p.singh PARVINDER SINGH 2016.04.26 12:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh