Rajesh v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No. 41672 of 2024 Date of Decision: 13.09.2024 Rajesh ...PeƟƟoner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Mohan Sheoran, Advocate for Mr. Vinay Singh Rathee, Advocate for the peƟƟoner.

Mr. Aashish Bishnoi, D.A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Ketan AnƟl, Advocate for the complainant.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 18.07.2023 Rai District Sonipat, Haryana 120-B, 193, 419, 420, 466, 467, 468, 469, 471 IPC Seeking regular bail in the FIR capƟoned above, the peƟƟoner has come up before this Court under SecƟon 439 CrPC.

2.

Counsel for the peƟƟoner wishes to withdraw the present peƟƟon for the reason that default bail has been granted to the peƟƟoner. 3.

Disposed of as withdrawn. All pending applicaƟons, if any, stand disposed.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 13.09.2024 JyoƟ Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.17 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh