Anisurehman v. State Of Haryana And ORS
CWP-9445-2018 2023:PHHC:037515
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANIDGARH CWP-9445-2018 Date of Decision: 09.03.2023 Anisurehman ..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
Present:
Mr. Mohd. Arshad, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajneesh Chadwal, AAG, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3.
Mr. G.S. Dhillon, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 7. ***** VIKAS BAHL, J (ORAL) This is a civil writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.2 to make the enquiry against respondent No.7Sarpanch. Learned State counsel has submitted that the tenure of respondent No.7-Sarpanch has elapsed and thus, the present petition has become infructuous.
In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has become infructuous and as such, the same be disposed of. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
(VIKAS BAHL) 09.03.2023 JUDGE D.Bansal Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No DINESH BANSAL 2023.03.13 13:08 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh